Answer:
Yeah I think I have got an answer to this question also
Explanation:
<u>Right</u><u> </u><u>of</u><u> </u><u>human</u><u> </u><u>and</u><u> </u><u>its</u><u> </u><u>counterclaims</u><u> </u>
<u>PLEASE</u><u> </u><u>MARK ME</u><u> </u><u>BRAINLIEST IF</u><u> </u><u>MY ANSWER</u><u> </u><u>IS CORRECT</u><u> </u><u>PLEASE</u><u> </u>
Answer:
Yes
Explanation:
Umm because English is weird.
Answer:
The best way to paraphrase this excerpt is:
c. Britain has oppressed the colonists in many ways.
Explanation:
According to Thomas Paine in this excerpt, Britain was not only taxing the colonists. It was binding them in "all cases whatsoever", meaning Britain was trying its best to keep colonists under its control through several designs. In other words, Britain's government was oppressing the colonists in such a way that Paine felt it was comparable to slavery. Colonists had no freedom, no choice. As could be expected, such oppression led to rebellion.
Answer:
After Ralph’s tense, exciting stand against the hunters, the ending of Lord of the Flies is rife with irony. Ralph had thought the signal fire—a symbol of civilization—was the only way to lure rescuers to the island. Ironically, although it is indeed a fire that lures a ship to the island, it is not an ordered, controlled signal fire but rather the haphazard forest fire Jack’s hunters set solely for the purpose of killing Ralph
Explanation:
Answer:
Yes.
Explanation:
Primary sources are usually those written from people who experienced that event and/or provides evidence such as an item of clothing or even an oral account of explanations. An example of this would be Anne Frank's Diary or A pillar engraved with hieroglyphics.
