A) See picture for the table.
To make the table, multiply 47774 by 1.5% to get total that have diabetes and multiply 5855 by 2.5% to get total unemployed that have it, then using subtraction fill in the other squares of the table.
B)
Hypothesis:
H0: No association between employment and diabetes.
H1: Association between the two
Using a graphing calculator or Excel, run a chi-test.
Chi squared equals 31.844 with 1 degrees of freedom.
The two-tailed P value is less than 0.0001
With this information we can reject the null hypothesis and conclude there is an association between diabetes and employment.
C)
Although there is a statistical significance, there really is no practical significance between an incidence rate of 1.5 or 2.5%
Step-by-step explanation:
We have been given that David, Egil and Frances share money in the ratio 2:7:9.
Let 2x, 7x and 9x be the amounts of money that David, Agil and Frances get respectively.
We are told that Frances gets $80 more than David. So we can write this information in an equation as:

Now let us solve for x.


Now let us substitute
in 7x (amount of money that Egil gets).

Upon cancelling out 7 from numerator and denominator we will get,
Therefore, Egil will get $80.
Answer:
The answer is c
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
option A
Step-by-step explanation:

The correct answer is –6x + 15 < 10 – 5x.
We can tell this by solving for x.
–3(2x – 5) < 5(2 – x) ----> Multiply to the parenthesis.
-6x + 15 < 10 - 5x ----> This is answer #3 and now we add 5x to both sides
-x + 15 < 10 ----> subtract 15 from both sides
-x < -5 ----> Divide by -1
x > 5 (Note that you have to change the direction of the sign when dividing by a -1. Therefore it does not match answer #1).