Answer:
[-2, ∞]
Step-by-step explanation:
15 - √(x+2)
domain is any value as long as (x+2) is not-negative, since √ of a negative number has no Real solution.
x+2 ≥ 0 ⇒ x ≥ -2
<span>Equation at the end of step 1 :</span><span> (((x3)•y)-(((3x2•y6)•x)•y))-6y = 0
</span><span>Step 2 :</span><span>Step 3 :</span>Pulling out like terms :
<span> 3.1 </span> Pull out like factors :
<span> -3x3y7 + x3y - 6y</span> = <span> -y • (3x3y6 - x3 + 6)</span>
Trying to factor a multi variable polynomial :
<span> 3.2 </span> Factoring <span> 3x3y6 - x3 + 6</span>
Try to factor this multi-variable trinomial using trial and error<span>
</span>Factorization fails
<span>Equation at the end of step 3 :</span><span> -y • (3x3y6 - x3 + 6) = 0
</span><span>Step 4 :</span>Theory - Roots of a product :
<span> 4.1 </span> A product of several terms equals zero.<span>
</span>When a product of two or more terms equals zero, then at least one of the terms must be zero.<span>
</span>We shall now solve each term = 0 separately<span>
</span>In other words, we are going to solve as many equations as there are terms in the product<span>
</span>Any solution of term = 0 solves product = 0 as well.
Solving a Single Variable Equation :
<span> 4.2 </span> Solve : -y = 0<span>
</span>Multiply both sides of the equation by (-1) : y = 0
The second option: 4x² - x + 1
All you have to do is add the like terms:
3x² + x² = 4x²
4x - 5x = -x
-2 + 3 = 1
Combine all the results and you will get your solution!
The graph on #6 describes a scatterplot. Because years of experience is the input, this makes the starting salary our output. Finding the best fitting line in a scatterplot requires the line to follow a trajectory similar to that of the points. As a result, there will be outliers. Since I don't know what "the calculator" is meant by this problem, I have used a different program. I hope it works for you. Good luck.
Answer:
The correct option is;
Simpson Paradox
Step-by-step explanation:
The phenomenon whereby particular trends are prevalent in small data portions but are not evident or an inverse trend is observe when the portions are joined together is known as Simpson's paradox.
Whereby the data for calculating the bating averages as found online are given as follows;
Season, Derek Jeter David Justice
1995, 12/48 = 0.250 104/411 ≈ 0.253
1996, 183/582 ≈ 0.314 45/140 ≈ 0.321
The overall hits to the overall bats ratio are;
, (183 + 12)/(582 + 48) ≈0.310 (104+45)/(411+140) = 0.27
Which shows that Derek Jeter's overall average was better than Justice's average
