Answer:
$4,600
Explanation:
Data provided in the question:
Purchasing cost of the van = $20,000
Adjusted basis = $5,800
Worth of the van at the time of accident = $6,000
Insurance reimbursement = $1,200
Now,
The amount of Riley's casualty loss deduction will be
= Adjusted basis - insurance reimbursement
or
Amount of Riley's casualty loss deduction = $5,800 - $1,200
or
Amount of Riley's casualty loss deduction = $4,600
un u get the numbers then subtract them and come good with the answer
Options:
A) Holding period return (HPR)
B) Effective annual return
C) Annual percentage rate
D) There is not enough information to make a definitive choice.
Answer:
Option B is correct.
Effective annual return
Explanation:
Robert invested in stock and received a positive return over a 9-month period then the effective annual return will be the greatest.
Answer:
D. Zeta prevails, but only if the assignment is signed and in writing
Explanation:
Zeta prevails but only if the assignment is in writing and is signed.
If the assignment is express thereby and is signed by the parties in contract , then zeta can demand the amount from willy. Without any written consent and permission , willy cannot enforce the payment to zeta.
This is the best option in this case .
Answer: C- Alzania's neighbor exported half its production of cotton that year
Explanation: Alzania produces and consumes 500,000 tons of cotton during a year. While, the neighbor which also employs the same number of people in the cotton industry, consumed 400,000 tons of cotton. There is no information on production of the neighbor. Just by looking at the consumption units we can argue that Alzania has an absolute advantage over the neighbor as it consumes more. However, if there is any information on the amount of exports of cotton from the neighbor then it will weaken the absolute advantage conclusion.
Thus, if <em>Alzania's neighbor exported half its production of cotton that year </em>the total production of cotton is greater of the neighbor than Alzania.