Answer:
They had no proof whatsoever!
Explanation:
The problem is that, if the american teachers thought they saw that specific painting, and the person who later offered the police officers fruit, and acted surprised, could've hid the painting before the police got here. What the teachers could've done is take a picture and have proof for when the cops did get there. If they didn't have a phone, they should've kept their eye on the painting, someway or another.
HOPE THIS HELPS!! (:
Answer:
The answer is letter D. correct.
Explanation:
This selection contains no run-on sentences. Run-on sentences happen when we put together two independent clauses without connecting them with proper punctuation and introductory words. Independent clauses contain a subject and predicate and express a complete thought on their own, without depending on other clauses.
The only option where a run-on could happen would be letter B. We have two independent clauses - followed by dependent ones, but they don't really matter here -, "I was shocked to learn that he had a hefty collection of hip hop saved on his MP3 player" and "I was shocked that he knew how to use the technology." However, they are properly connected with a semicolon and the adverb "furthermore". Therefore, we do not have a run-on. Options A and C would not allow for run-on's, since they do not present two independent clauses. The best option is letter d. Correct.
Answer:
The 2nd option.
Explanation:
Many people think I'm much taller than I actually am. I wear platform shoes with really high heels.
A., C., and D. are all correct
