Answer:
it indeed should be harder.
Explanation:
So every people can be sure who they need to choose and vote
Answer:
yes
Explanation:
because of uncontrolled of political law
The supreme court ruled in Katz vs United States expands the fourth amendment protection against unreasonable searches and seizures to cover electronic wiretaps.
Explanation:
Katz found guilty because of illegal gambling and the appellate court found that there was no physical intrusion into the phone booth and there was no need for warrant.
The supreme court uses a wiretap to intercept a private telephone conversation and was not a search for fourth amendment.
The majority opinion of Katz vs United States had overturned the court of appeals affirmation of the conviction.
The fourth amendment is the bill of rights of constitution that protects people from unlawful searches and occupation.
This is done through a legal proceeding called a motion for summary judgment. A plaintiff who moves for summary judgment must file a written motion request with the court, along with a detailed brief. These required writings afford the judge the opportunity to review the issues before the occurrence of a court hearing.
Pls mark me as brainiest
The given is called a writ of attachment or an order of attachment
.
<u>
Explanation:
</u>
In the court of law the defendant is an individual or company accused for committing a crime. If the judge has pronounced a judgement in favour of the plaintiff in the case of any disputes which may be a settlement in the form of money or in the form of assets.
The plaintiff may take the help of the court or court appointed sheriff to settle the dues from defendant. So the court appointed officials will make use of their power and protect the assets being sold. And this court process is known as order of attachment.
