Answer:
While they noted the lack of a single code of ethics that covered all forensic disciplines, the working group identified four major categories addressed by every code of ethics they reviewed: 1) working within professional competence, 2) providing clear and objective testimony, 3) avoiding conflicts of interest, and 4) avoiding bias and influence, real or perceived.
Explanation:
Answer:UCC § 2–105 defines goods as follows: (1) "Goods" means all things (including specially manufactured goods) which are movable at the time of identification to the contract for sale other than the money in which the price is to be paid, investment securities (Article 8) and things in action.
Explanation:
Answer:
The answer is: Stage 6 of "Reflective Reasoning"
Explanation:
The Reflective Judgment Model is used in order to describe how people from adolescence going to adulthood develop <u>"reasoning." </u>This framework consists of<em> 7 stages</em>. These stages are categorized under three kinds of thinking<em> (Pre-Reflective Reasoning, Quasi-Reflective Reasoning and Reflective Reasoning). </em>
The situation above falls under "Stage 6 of Reflective Reasoning." Under this stage,<u><em> "reflective thinking"</em></u> is considered. So, people in this stage know that<em> knowledge is not certain nor absolute,</em> thus they try to compare their opinion with others. Just like Carole and Juan above, even though they have opposing views, Carole understands Juan's opinion.
Thus, this explains the answer.
Answer:xhdxhchchchchhhcchchhchcchdhdhdjdjjjd judjrrjrrjrjr. Jusjssjsjsjjs
Explanation:
Hduhudhd
