I would say true. I say this because there have been times where scientists find out that there are better ways of performing experiments, or found that certain materials work better for certain tasks. (Especially true in medicinal fields!)
The correct sequence in which the proteins are synthesized is DNA --> RNA --> Protein (B).
First the DNA is transcribed into RNA and then by translation RNA is converted into protein.
<h3>Protein Synthesis</h3>
- Protein synthesis is the process of making protein molecules.
- This process includes two processes, transcription and translation.
- In transcription, the DNA act as a template to produce RNA. This is a three-step process, initiation, elongation, termination.
- In translation, the RNA with the help of codons produces protein. This is also a three-step process: Initiation, elongation, and termination.
Thus, that's how proteins are made. And it is a repeated process.
Learn more about protein synthesis, here:
brainly.com/question/7575381
To try and help although thee aren't any answers i would say... if they were to literally conduct a field study such as this, much pollution would occur, Millions of fish would die as of plants also. And would over-all Lake Michigan would never be the same again.
Ecosystems have trouble adjusting to short-term changes - This is false.
Eco system changes can be long term and short term. Few short-term environmental changes that can change an eco system are - drought, smog, volcanic eruptions, floods etc. An ecosystem can easily adapt to short-term changes. For example, after a forest fire plants can re-grow from their roots. Many species have features to help them cope with natural, short-term environmental changes.
