They had three objectives: compose a statement of colonial rights, identify British parliaments violation of those rights, and provide a plan that would convince Britain to restore those rights.
Hope this helped
Answer:
Why shouldn't we judge historical figures by the standards of our time?
Many of the vices we might rightfully judge a historical society or individual for are largely universal across culture and society.
We should judge them accordingly and learn from their mistakes, but we should also judge them by the degree to which that person or culture rejected those common vices and built something better. This is something quite rare and it’s far more useful as a learning tool for us to focus on this.
For example, the Greeks and Romans practiced slaveryBut so did every other ancient society. What is unique and admirable about the Greeks and Romans is the degree to which they did respect indvidual rights, seriously questioned slavery as an institution, and developed a secular, pro reason culture
if my answer helps you than mark me as brainliest
Because the United States of America was suddenly and deliberately attacked by naval and air forces of the Empire of Japan.
He described it as a cruelty and that it was bad but at the same time he owned about 600 slaves and only freed 7 in his whole life so it’s really complex
The correct answer is D) hot dogs and hot dog buns.
If hot dogs go on sale, the number of hot dogs demanded will increase. At the same time, demand for hot dog buns, regardless of if buns are on sale or not, will also increase because they are a complementary product.
If the price of hot dog buns were to increase drastically, the consumption of both products would likely decline.