The correct answer is A. Post hoc ergo propter hoc
Explanation:
In a Post hoc ergo proper hoc fallacy the speaker considers one event is the cause of another because one event follows the other in time. This implies the speaker incorrectly assumes one event to be the cause of another without real evidence. This occurs in the example presented because the speaker thinks Jalessa being a President is the cause that the school was broken into. However, there is no evidence Jalessa is the direct cause of this event and this cannot be concluded based on the fact the incident occurred after Jalessa became the class president.
I'm pretty confident your answer is adjective. Hope this helped!
Answer:
It emphasizes and connects his points to one logical conclusion.
Explanation:
Answer: It means an earlier event or action that is regarded as an example or guide to be considered in subsequent similar circumstances.
Explanation:
The woman and the host is the characters in "Arrangement in Black and White" that conveys refinement because the woman is the one that ask the host to present her to one of a negro singer which is Walter Williams, so the host and the woman does or conveys refinement to the singer.
