Court precedents are used in case of having no clear interpretation of the law for a particular case. President's precedents are simply acts performed by a President in a similar situation.
Explanation:
<u>Court precedents serve as an alternate to written laws when the existing guided laws are not suitable or simply not enough for a particular situation that arises.</u>
For this, the court can refer to a previous judgement as basis for their own judgement. <u>Thus, court precedents are enforceable by law.</u>
<u>Precedents set by a President serve at best, as guidelines.</u>
They are simply acts performed by a previous President when met with a similar situation.
The correct answer for the given statement above would be FALSE. It is not true that action-reaction forces always act on the same objects, rather, action-reaction forces ALWAYS act<span> on different </span>objects. <span>For every </span>action force<span>, there is an equal and opposite </span>reaction force<span>; </span>forces always<span> come in pairs. </span>Hope this answers your question.
the answer is A. Hope I could help
Well i would put The purpose of Sherman's March to the Sea was to frighten Georgia's civilian population into abandoning the Confederate cause Sherman's soldiers did not destroy any of the towns in their path, but they stole food and livestock and burned the houses and barns of people who tried to fight back this severely hurt the economy and will to fight on of the Georgian people
