1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
viktelen [127]
3 years ago
13

Can you plz help!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Social Studies
1 answer:
Mazyrski [523]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

ITS THE FIRST OPTION- BFJDBDBD

You might be interested in
Is it apparent that the hammurabi code is clearly the product of a civilization, rather than some other kind of early society? D
frez [133]

Yes, it is apparent that the hammurabi code is clearly the product of a civilization, rather than some other kind of early society, because it was the first written code. The distintion between early societies and civilization is the ability to write and read. The hammurabi code was the first one written, thus making it the first law code of a civilization.

---

Yes, the code illustrate key elements of what a civilization is. The code is perhaps the first example of a codified law, where the principle of "eye for eye" is explained and adjusted in adherence to a variety of circumstances. Moreover, it offers examples of law regarding different matters like weddings, divorce, reproductive law and so on.

---

In Babylonia at the time there were three main social classes, which were property owners, freed men, and slaves. Those classes played a role when it came to the application of the law, as a crime towards an higher class had a greater punishment then a crime towrds a lower class, for example. Euqlity is in this sense was not yet achieved.

---

Yes, the code suggest wide gaps among them. As said before, there were disparities in treatment, whatever the crime was. A property owner that assault a slave was a sever less crime than the opposite case, for example, proving that some wide gaps were present and influenced the everyday life of the population.

---

Very low protection. Babylonia at the time was a very patriarchal society, so the protection of women were reserved to the men in charge of them. It was mostly the men who were refunded in case and the protection extended to women were often written as protection made in order to protected what it was considered mostly like a good.

---

Because women did not have rights on their own body. They cannot decide for themselves and have very restricted possibilities in the society. Mostly, they were considered like a very precious good, and thus they were treated. They could not partecipate in the political or social life and have a very limited role in society.

---

Yes, babylonia had a powerful state with a large bureaucracy. It was perhaps the first state with a large bureaucracy, that was in charge of taxes and justice and other state duties. Bureaucracy also was what allowed the country to expand and extend its influences over a lot of territories, so for a long time bureaucracy was also responsable for making babylonia thriving.

---

Perhaps prisons. They were not a concept back in the day. All charges were resolved at the moment and there were not the concept of prison as a place where people stayed because they have committed a crime. What was present was a system that assure an immediate repercussion on the guilty part, like losing an hand.

---

Because the accusation, if proven true, would lead to an immediate execution of the penalty, thus effectively limited the "guilty" person, so a false accusation was perhaps a tool that many people used when they wanted something and they did not achieve to those results. It was perhaps also used as a vendetta against enemies.

6 0
3 years ago
How did the earliest people's adapt to their environments. List 2 ancient people and explain how each adapted to their environme
Doss [256]
Not much is known about how the earliest civilizations adapted to their environments except through their cultural habits (i.e. religion, games, etc). The Mayans took advantage of the surrounding rain forests and developed a very heavy agricultural and farming civilization, focusing in the cultivation of maize, beans, squash, peppers, avocado, and other important foods. They created a system for tearing down the rain forest in order to make room for their fields and left the watering of the plants up to the gods as they believed that the sun and rain were entirely divine. The Aztecs, however, settled in a more marshy land that was difficult to cultivate. Instead, they relied on military power and strength to conquer other civilizations and steal their food to keep their civilization alive. They did a bit of growing on their own, but not to the same scale as the Mayans, developing water ways and canals to transport goods from conquered cities to their capital.
8 0
3 years ago
Both the Virginia and New Jersey Plans called for? ......
chubhunter [2.5K]

Answer: Two houses.

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
Explain what happens to the local economy once the mining industry no longer exists.
Novosadov [1.4K]
We cant make more money 
the governer put gold in the money
therefore no more money
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Scenario 1: A soccer player chants before a soccer match.
Liono4ka [1.6K]

Answer:

The answer is option "C"

Explanation:

popular sovereignty is the rule that the authority of a state and its administration are made and supported by the consent of its people, through their chosen agents (rule by the individuals), who are the wellspring of all political force. popular sovereignty communicates an idea, and doesn't really reflect or depict a political reality.

To discuss popular sovereignty is to put extreme expert in the individuals. There are an assortment of manners by which power might be communicated. It could be quick as in individuals make the law themselves, or intervened through delegates who are dependent upon political decision and review; it very well might be extreme as in individuals have a negative or blackball over enactment, or it very well might be something significantly less sensational. So, mainstream sway covers a large number of institutional prospects. For each situation, in any case, popular sovereignty accepts the presence of some type of famous assent, and it is thus that each meaning of conservative government infers a theory of consent.

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • How would the Proclamation of 1763 conflict with the concept of Natural Right?
    11·1 answer
  • Please help me with these three questions it’s for a grade and thanks for your time
    14·2 answers
  • How many metric systems are there
    10·1 answer
  • Which is most accurate about political socialization in the US?
    7·1 answer
  • In trying to understand why some individuals become addicted to anxiolytics and others do not, it is important to consider the n
    10·1 answer
  • Suppose that one news outlet makes the president’s actions sound very reasonable, whereas the other makes the president’s action
    14·1 answer
  • Which of the broad areas of I-O psychology interests you the most and why?
    10·1 answer
  • What is the correct meaning of the word method?
    11·1 answer
  • How do democracies accommodate various social divisions? Explain with examples.
    6·1 answer
  • Which quote most likely would be included in the prosecutor's closing statement?
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!