Answer:
Independent
Explanation:The clause can stand in its own.
First of all we can not compare Chester, a serial killer, with Joey, who committed a murder without intent, the intention defines the type of crime, and consequently the penalty that it must be met. Joey should not be considered a criminal because he has no criminal mind, and his action was not planned, in addition to having special needs, which places him in a possible state of no criminal responsibility, that will depend on the level and type of disability he possess. According to the laws, parents are not obliged to disclose their children, but there is a responsibility regarding the obstruction of justice, and his father could respond criminally. In this case, you must ask for the acquittal of the penalty for the disability, but at the same time, the clarification of the circumstances to grant justice to those affected.
(This is about a tiger, haha)
Its claws were so sharp, so they realized it's too dangerous to risk their lives to approach the tiger.
Answer:
The author feels at ease at the beginning of the paragraph because it said he was at ease at the beginning. Further into the passage the author feels he started to feel disoriented because in the paragraph it says "I felt myself getting pale and wished them gone. My head ached and I fancied a ringing in the ear:but it continued and became more distinct."
Explanation:
Answer:
Explanation:
It's easier to pick out the one that doesn't which is the second one. Pete won't like that review comment very much.
I take it that the rest were comments left on the site of the company involved. If that is true, Pete would like A, Lou would like C and Lunch Bunch would like D.
