<span>A person who files a civil lawsuit against another party is called a "plaintiff".
</span>In a court, the plaintiff is the individual or gathering who is blaming someone else or aggregate for some bad behavior. In case you're the offended party, you are guaranteeing that a law was broken, and you're in court to introduce your case.
The plaintiff charges, the respondent tries to demonstrate that allegation off-base. You've seen this relationship on network shows about legal counselors, or possibly you've been to court yourself.
Harley is right because he was save from the predator
This question is missing the answer choices. I was able to find the complete question. Since the passage is the same, I will omit it:
. . . this scenario illustrates:
A. the overjustification effect
B. the outgroup homogeneity effect
C. the bystander effect
D. the continued influence effect
Answer:
The scenario illustrates:
B. the outgroup homogeneity effect.
Explanation:
Ida's beliefs about her own team and the rival team are a typical example of the outgroup homogeneity effect. This effect can be described as a perception of diversity when it comes to one's own group but of homogeneity when it comes to other groups. In other words, a person would perceive members belonging to other groups, such as a rival team, as being more similar to one another. Notice that Ida sees the rival team's members to be "alike in all aspects" while her own team's members are "more diverse in terms of skill, experience, and possessing game strategies."
Thank you so much (teachers name) for (insert what they did). Thank you go much again
sincerely,
(your name)
