Answer:
QUESTION:
I need help on this pleaseee...
ANSWER:
2 pairs of pants = $18
4 pairs of pants = $36
6 pairs of pants = $54
1 pair of pants = $6
Step-by-step explanation:
Hope that this helps you out! :)
If you have any questions please put them in the comment section below this answer.
Have a great rest of your day/night!
Please thank me on my profile if this answer has helped you.
-3/2x
The rational expression would not be defined only when the denominator is divided by 0
That is:
2x =0
x = 0/2
x =0
Hence it would not be defined when x = 0.
Hope this helps.
To do this problem, you need to use a process called completing the square. Let me explain:
To complete the square on the function f(x) = x² + 8x +13, first group the first two terms in ( ) and leave some space at the end as follows:
f(x) = (x² + 8x ) + 13 Now our next step is to fill in the space and adjust our expression on the right hand side of the function. To do this, we take half of the middle number 8 and then square it: so 4² = 16 and we fill in our space inside the ( ) with this value 16;
f(x) = (x² + 8x + 16) + 13 now what we have done is to increase the overall value of our expression on the right by 16, but we want the overall value to remain the same. To fix this we simply need to subtract 16 at the end like this: f(x) = (x² + 8x + 16) + 13 -16 we can simplify and get the following.
f(x) = (x² + 8x + 16) - 3 At this point we're almost done.. All we need to do now is to rewrite the what is in the parentheses in a slightly different form. Here is what it will look like: f(x) = (x + 4)² - 3 notice all I did was take the sum of the square root of x² and the square root of 16 originally in the ( ) to get then new expression inside the ( ) and then square that ( )²
Now this is a nice form to have because you can get the vertex straight from this form.. IN FACT this is called vertex form or (h,k) form for short. In general the form is f(x) = a(x - h)² + k don't worry about the 'a' for now.. you might see that in our case it is just 1 and will not effect our equation. You only have to consider this if the original leading coefficient of the quadratic is not 1 to begin with...
So you can see that our vertex is (-4,-3)
Hope this is helpful, but if you have questions let me know.
Yes, it is. You may prove it using something like this: 1 is an integer. 1-1 is a difference between integers. A difference between integers returns an integer, so 0 is an integer.
Domain: (-infinity, infinity)
Range: (-infinity, infinity)
Asymptote: none