Answer:
They started to help prevent malaria, as well as typhus and other infectious diseases, from spreading across the U.S
Explanation:
The interactionist perspective is the sociological perspective that would most likely be concerned with the stigmatizing nature of formal social controls that require convicted offenders to register with police agencies and have their pictures published in newspapers to make their identities publicly known.
An approach to sociology known as the interactionist perspective emphasizes the regular interactions people have with one another as the cornerstone of how societies form. Instead of concentrating solely on the function of society, interactionism emphasizes the role of people as social actors.
An interactionist approach places a lot of emphasis on social interactions, or how individuals interact with one another.
The emphasis on interpersonal interactions, the use of symbols in communication and interaction, interpretation as a component of action, and the construction of the self by individuals and others in adaptable, flexible social processes through communication are some traits of the symbolic interactionist perspective.
To learn more about the Interactionist Perspective refer to:
brainly.com/question/16270837
#SPJ1
Answer:
it is
3) A
4) false
5) A
most answers are online if you are concerned
The correct answer is C) because they wanted to avoid the discomfort of facing an unpopular view.
<em>In the majority opinion, Fortas suggested that the reason the school authorities suspended the students was that they wanted to avoid the discomfort of facing an unpopular view. </em>
We are referring to the case Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School District that was decided on February 24, 1969.
In 1965, five students decided to wear black armbands in protest of the Vietnam War and they were suspended by the school for doing that. In the majority opinion, Judge Abe Fortas suggested that the reason the school authorities suspended the students was that they wanted to avoid the discomfort of facing an unpopular view. At the end of the case, the Court decided that the use of armbands as a protest was not a motive to cause any disruption and that the protest was protected by freedom of speech.
Thomas Jefferson is the correct answer
