1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
tia_tia [17]
3 years ago
14

Two different interpretations have been proposed to explain group polarization. the persuasive arguments interpretation is to __

______ as the social comparison interpretation is to ________.
Social Studies
1 answer:
drek231 [11]3 years ago
4 0
The persuasive arguments interpretation is to "Informational social influence" as the social comparison interpretation is to "normative social influence".<span>



</span>Informational social influence refers to a mental and social phenomenon where individuals expect the activities of others trying to reflect adjust conduct in a given situation.The normative social influence includes adjusting keeping in mind the end goal to be acknowledged or loved by a gathering, not really in light of the fact that one really trusts the things one is doing or saying.
You might be interested in
HELP PLEASE
ANTONII [103]

Answer:

The questions above were posed on a debating website and some of the results are shown below. You task is to write your own response

to the questions above. You should aim to write at least 110 words saying why you think the ToV was fair or unfair to Germany. You should

also say what Allied leaders did you most agree with and what provision (clause) did you think was the most fair or unfair. Use the

students answers to help you decide what information you should put in your own answer but make sure you give reasons for your

responses using your work from class and research you do at home.

Explanation:

im so sorry if it didint help

4 0
3 years ago
The idea that parental behaviors determine a child's future career may seem plausible, while the idea that one's future can be p
Julli [10]

However, both ideas should be "tested" using "an empirical approach" to see if they hold up under scrutiny.


Empirical approach alludes to the logical strategy for inquiry and perception through experiments.  

Psychology is additionally a science which is related to the thought behind empirical approach is to take your own convictions and inclinations out of the condition from real examinations. You should make determinations in view of empirical information and not what your feeling says.  

Since, psychology manages sentiments and feelings, it is difficult to precisely quantify information. So it is more vital for clinicians to take after empirical approach before distributing any hypothesis or speculation.

4 0
2 years ago
Ksjndndsndnnn s sjwnd dns ds cxjdsn dsjndnjewnwdjiew?
Katen [24]
Great question. Really. 10/10
7 0
3 years ago
Ty's parents divorced when he was 5. his father moved out of state, and his mother is kept busy trying to keep a roof over their
DochEvi [55]
Ty's mother has an Permissive type of parenting style.
5 0
3 years ago
1-Do you believe skyscrapers are worth the footprint they leave on the environment? Explain why or why not. *
RideAnS [48]

Answer:

Explanation:

Imagine that instead of sky scrapers we had all the offices in them occupying lots. It would be somewhat like a mid west city like Great Falls Montana. I'm asking you to see New York as you would see Great Falls.

Great falls has some buildings that are 2 stories -- none that are much more that I know of. Great Falls has a population of 40000 roughly. New York has a population of about 8000000. So to construct New York on a Great Falls model, you would need 200 communities the size of Great Falls. Consider what that would do the environment.

The connection to each place of business and residential area would be many many times larger. Waste would create an immense almost unimaginable problem. The environment wouldn't know how to handle the spread created by small residential homes and no more than 1 or 2 story buildings.

The spread would create many times the problems that skyscrapers create and that's only 1 problem.

Question 2

This is a hard question. It depends on the slave owners. Some would think of their slaves as human beings same as them. Some were taught to read and write along with the owner's children. Most were not. Some were taught some sort of religious principles. Many were not. Some wanted freedom, others did not.

There's no simple answer to this. The economy of the south depended on slaves. No matter how humane the owners, there was still work to be done.

4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • How do private property rights contribute to a capitalist system?
    10·1 answer
  • Why are parts of ecuador in the tropics cooler than parts of southern chile
    15·1 answer
  • Explain the difference between producers and consumers and give 3 examples. HELP!!!!!!
    14·2 answers
  • Porcelain became a major trade item because it was
    15·2 answers
  • A moral imperative prescribes an action, not for the sake of some result, but simply because that action is our moral duty. True
    13·1 answer
  • Read the following paragraph, and choose the best revision for one of its sentences.Dr. Blake is retiring at the end of the mont
    10·1 answer
  • What is a prophet, and what kind of writings are found in the collection of books called the Prophets?
    15·1 answer
  • Which statement best completes the diagram showing the recall process at
    15·2 answers
  • In the ___ age infinite quantities of facts are widely available to anyone who can use a computer. Multiple choice question. peo
    11·1 answer
  • _____ refers to a set of assumptions, attitudes, and procedures that guide researchers in creating questions to investigate, in
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!