Answer:
The largest three-digit number divisible by 24 and 54 is:
Step-by-step explanation:
To identify the largest number what I did was dividing 999 (the largest whole three-digit number of all) in the first number given (24):
With this number, you know that you must multiply 24 by a number like 41 or less until you find a number that can be divisible by 54 and obtain a whole number, so:
- 24*41= 984/54= 18.22 (how the number obtained is not a whole number, this is not the correct).
- 24*40= 960/54= 17.77 (this is not).
- 24*39= 936/54= 17.33 (this is not).
- 24*38= 912/54= 16.88 (this is not).
- 24*37=888/54= 16.44 (this is not).
- <u>24*36= 864/54= 16 (This is the correct</u>).
Now, you have identified that the number 864, you can prove it by dividing this in 24 and 54:
it would take 8 weeks for the amount in your savings to be equal to the amount in checking
Y is 9 because 2 times 5 is 10, then you take that same 10 and subtract 1 and then you have 9
C. You can't control the temperature which makes it the independent variable. People come DEPENDING on the temperature. So the number of people that come each day is the dependent variable.
No it's not a reasonable conclusion. Correlation does not lead to causation. If two variables are linked, then they may affect one another or there may be another set of factors involved. There isn't enough info to know for sure. The fact that r = -0.7 is fairly close to r = -1 indicates there's moderately strong negative correlation, but I don't think it's strong enough in my opinion. More research is needed.
In short, the keyword "caused" as part of the claim is what makes it unreasonable. There is no way to know that not eating vegetables leads to high blood pressure. It may be true but again, more info is needed.
