By definition the rate of change of a function is given by:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/febfb/febfb3bc084b0853ae2747477c0df0fdbd992853" alt="AVR = \frac{Change In Y}{Change In X}"
Or equivalently:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d1fa/6d1fa9977add4131517924082dc7a590688b50de" alt="AVR = \frac{y2 - y1}{x2 - x1}"
Substituting the values given in the problem we have:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/310aa/310aaa849de5e5b02fea0451d72c3d9a5546223b" alt="AVR = \frac{1.5}{18}"
Rewriting we have:
Answer:
the rate of change of the ramp is:
Answer:
450 divided by 75 = t
he plated 6 trees
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
94% so C
Step-by-step explanation:
I did the assignment
Hope it helps
Answer:
3/10
Step-by-step explanation:
i answered it already
Answer:
For the reasons mentioned in the explanation section, it is indeed a weak generalization:
Step-by-step explanation:
- No, there is not enough data provided on certain subjects' age, socioeconomic status, etc. that may have influenced the investing decision.
- No, the survey isn't random, the study is irregular because each has a fair probability of expressing their true beliefs, here in this query it's written they've been told individuals are given actual medication, which may have contributed to the Hawthorne studies giving incorrect outcomes.
- No, the amount isn't sufficient mostly on the premise of 28 subject areas with be provided oxytocin, and therefore only one test being performed should we not be able to determine the results to implement for certain persons including billions of populace, it would be a hurried generalization.