Answer:
B false
Explanation:
because if it was a professional robbee he would not have been caught before or have a prior arrest record
Judicial restraint is the political theory that says courts shouldn't, unless absolutely required, issue rulings that broaden or alter the character of existing laws.
<h3>Justiciable constraint is exercised by whom?</h3>
A jurist (judge or justice) who upholds a philosophy of restraint can be described as one who considers democracy to have intrinsic, rather than just instrumental, value, that the judiciary is indeed the least powerful of the three branches of government, and who values stability and predictability in the lawmaking process.
<h3>Why do advocates of judicial restraint assert that judges are impervious to public sentiment?</h3>
They are freed from the strain of the outer world of public opinion since they do not have to worry about being reelected. In the end, the majority may not always be correct. The fact that the Founders established appointed judges and elected legislators is not by coincidence.
Learn more about Judicial restraint: brainly.com/question/29545866
#SPJ4
Answer:
not sure might be he acquired the entire oregon territory from great britain
Explanation:
The correct answer is A. The Magna Carta
Explanation:
In 1215, King John who was the ruler of England accepted to sign a document known as "The Magna Carta". In this important document, the king agreed to limit his power and protect certain rights. Indeed, through this document it was established the payments requested by the King should have a limit and some citizens (mainly noble citizens) had certain liberties including the right to own property. Moreover, this document is relevant even today because it was the base for other documents that protected civilians' rights.
