3 divided by 2/3 (plz give me brainliest)
Using the data you have given, it seems he can cut 1 and a half lawns on a third of a tank of gas. Taking this data, and multiplying it by 3, Nathans lawn mower can mow down 4 one-acre lawns, and a lawn that's half an acre. (Your answer is basically 4 lawns)
1394.87 is the answer I’m rambling now for the characters
<h3>
Answer: A) Only plot A</h3>
The reasoning is because all of the points for plot A are fairly close to the same straight line. This straight line has a positive slope. We call this line the regression line.
In contrast, plot B seems to have the points randomly scattered about. We can't draw a good fitting straight line to get near all of the points. So plot B does not show positive linear correlation.
Side note: the correlation coefficient for plot A will have its r value close to 1. The r value for plot B will be close to 0.
Cubic for sure. I’m in accelerated math no flex happy to help
