Answer:
d. normative social influence.
Explanation:
An example of normative social influence is peer pressure. You conform to what other people are doing so you can be accepted and avoid social ridicule or judgment.
Answer:
1. Massachusetts, Connecticut, Pennsylvania, Virginia, North Carolina, South Carolina, and Georgia voted for the Virginia Plan, while New York, New Jersey, and Delaware voted for the New Jersey Plan, an alternate that was also on the table. The delegates from Maryland were split, so the state's vote was null.
2. The New Jersey Plan (also known as the Small State Plan or the Paterson Plan) was a proposal for the structure of the United States Government presented by William Paterson at the Constitutional Convention on June 15, 1787.[1] The plan was created in response to the Virginia Plan, which called for two houses of Congress, both elected with apportionment according to population.[2] The less populous states were adamantly opposed to giving most of the control of the national government to the more populous states, and so proposed an alternative plan that would have kept the one-vote-per-state representation under one legislative body from the Articles of Confederation.
3. Roger Sherman and Oliver Ellsworth, both of the Connecticut delegation, created a compromise that, in a sense, blended the Virginia (large-state) and New Jersey (small-state) proposals regarding congressional apportionment.
Explanation:
Hope it help
HEY :))
The Best Answer Would Be A and C if multiple answers are allowed if not the best answer would be C i believe
Glad To Help :))
Answer:
The correct answer is letter "C": That the oral agreement fell outside the statute of frauds if the plaintiff satisfied the main-purpose doctrine.
Explanation:
<em>Power Entertainment Inc. </em>sued <em>National Football League Properties Inc.</em>(NFLP), saying the other party violated an oral agreement to allow it to assume a third party debt if the other party would allow it to acquire valuable third party business licenses previously held. The Court of Appeals ruled that fraud status did not apply in such cases in Texas, the state where it all took place.
The correct answer is clinically insignificant
In this sense, there was no significant difference between patients who used placebo and those who did not.
Scientifically proven, the placebo effect is centered on the idea that the patient's expectations and beliefs can promote biological changes in favor of curing diseases. There are confirmations of results of improvements in different diseases with the use of inactive drugs or the simulation of a medical procedure.
