D. ROMANCE BETWEEN A WORKER AND A SUPERVISOR MUST ALWAYS BE OUT OF BOUNDS.
This is true particularly when the worker is under the direct supervision of the supervisor. Romantic involvement is discouraged because it the case of supervisor and worker, there is a conflict of interest and it is unfair for other workers under the supervision of the same supervisor.
In the event that a romance between worker and supervisor is inevitable, it is more prudent for the worker to request for transfer to another division wherein she or he will not be under the supervisor's authority.
The price of a failed workplace romance may not always be your job. It may be hard one both parts but if they truly need their jobs and with no other employment option in sight, they must accept their failure and move on.
It is possible to keep personal and work roles separate. As long as you both are mature enough to set and discuss boundaries.
Productivity and efficiency are affected by office romance. Your performance is a reflection on your emotional well-being. If you fought with your partner, most likely, you will perform a lackluster job.
Answer:
Simple rate of return on Investment = 6.34%
Explanation:
As per the data given in the question,
Initial investment = $804,600
Realisable value = $22,400
Net cash flow = $804,600 - $22,400
= $782,200
Annual income:
Net income = Cash savings - Depreciation
= $139,000 - $89,400
= $49,600
Simple rate of return on Investment = Net income ÷ Net cash flow
= $49,600 ÷ $782,200
= 0.0634
= 6.34%
Answer:
27.42 m/s
Explanation:
Data provided in the question:
Distance traveled on a straight track = 0.754 km
Time taken to cover while going = 25.0 s
Time taken for the return = 30.0 s
Now,
Total distance covered = 2 × 0.754
= 1.508 Km
= 1508 m
Total time taken = 25 + 30 = 55 s
Therefore,
The average velocity of the car = Total distance ÷ Total time
= 1508 ÷ 55
= 27.42 m/s
Answer:
False
Explanation:
economist Kenji supports contractionary monetary policy because he believes that expectations adjust quickly in response to changes in policy and the efforts made by fed( an decrease in government spending and/or an increase in taxes) will be worth and the costs of reducing inflation will be less.
Whereas economist Eric, thinks that change in money supply is not a good idea to reduce inflation as it will work very slowly.