What push factors drove farmers to give up their farms and move to the city

History

2 answers:

castortr0y [4]3 years ago

5 0

Lack of Jobs/Poverty: Economic factors provide the main motivation behind migration.

scoundrel [369]3 years ago

3 0

They had to produce more and more crops to raise enough money to feed their families. Over time the money was cut down because of how much they produced. Kind of like clearance. They couldn't feed there families anymore so they sold or gave their farm away and moved to the city for better work

You might be interested in

What is "777" meaning?

nalin [4]

Angel Number 777, is a sign for good things to come. Commonly associated with luck, and the highest payout on a slot machine. It means that the angels were very close to you at this time, providing you with luck.

Hope this helps!

7 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Besides cultivating liberty gardens, how did American women contribute to the United States' war efforts?

asambeis [7]

The correct answer is d. They went to work in war-related industries to fill in for the men who were away at war.

During World War II, millions of men were drafted to serve in the United States military. This left millions of jobs open on the homefront. The result was a significant increase in the amount of women working in war-related industries.

The enormous need for guns, ammunition, tanks, etc. resulted in women all over the country breaking traditional gender roles by working in war-related industries. This movement was spurred by propganda, with one of the most famous ones being the Rosie the Riveter campaign.

4 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Short description of how the Alexander empire fell from power?

sveta [45]

Answer:

my asnwer agan

Explanation:

Severаl fасtоrs саused the sudden соllарse оf the Emрire thаt Аlexаnder built. These inсlude the eаrly аnd the sоmewhаt unexрeсted deаth оf the supreme ruler, аbsenсe оf а сараble suссessоr, rebelliоus generаls, аnd the size оf the territоries Аlexаnder hаd invаded.

6 0

2 years ago

What do you think are the advantages and disadvantages of these methods of direct democracy: Initiative, Referendum, and Recall?

Marina86 [1]

In the United States, where there is no direct democracy at the federal level, more than half of the states (and many municipalities) allow citizens to vote on initiatives, and the vast majority of states have mechanisms to promote initiatives or referendums. There are also community meetings (town meetings) and various institutions at the municipal level where citizens can interact with those responsible for administration in decision-making. The disadvantages of the initiatives is that any citizen could present it at any time and it should be analyzed and taken into account, which could take a long time.

Referendums are elections in which voters do not elect representatives but participate in taking direct participation on some important issue of the country. As advantages, it is highlighted that the Referendum can be used to solve problems of a political nature, or the improvement of the governmental image, when it is too deteriorated in front of the popular collective. Another aspect that touches a possible disadvantage, has to do with the circumstance that can be used as a strategy or political weapon to satisfy political interests or ambitions of power. It has also been argued that this figure has a meaning called "zero sum", that is, where the majority wins everything and the minority loses everything, originating a tyranny of majorities, that have answered one or several questions about a specific issue and that in the case at hand, has to do with the end of the armed conflict, questions that are closed and must be answered with the yes or no.
Revocation of mandate, revocation of mandate or recall referendum (in English, recall election), is a procedure by which citizens can cease their public office to an elected official, before the end of their respective period, by direct vote or by collection of signatures, depending on the geographic or population dimensions. Those who propose a revocation mechanism argue that these have a disciplinary effect on elected officials, in which elected representatives will make fewer unpopular decisions if this may cause them to be more likely to be subject to a recall campaign. However, the same argument is also used against the recall: opponents argue that the recall completely undermines representative government as it causes elected officials fear to make unpopular but necessary decisions. Another argument in favor of direct democracy is that it provides voters with a continuous opportunity to make a democratic decision about who governs them, since they not only have the opportunity to elect the people who represent them every two to six years, but also to maintain a degree of control over the decision of its duration in the position. However, its opponents maintain that the mechanism of revocation could be used irresponsibly, and that this could be used by the political parties as a political weapon against the rival of the holders. The assertion that the revocation mechanism is being used as a political instrument was made by many Democrats against activists of Republican parties in connection with the recall in California in 2003.

6 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Why was the entry of the united states considered a turning point in the war in world war 1?

ziro4ka [17]

It's greatly reduce the morale of the central power

8 0

3 years ago