Answer:
competitive disadvantage
Explanation:
According to my research on different business strategies, I can say that based on the information provided within the question in this scenario Mainline Ltd. has a competitive disadvantage. This term refers to an unfavorable circumstance or condition that causes a firm to underperform in an industry. Which in this case low demand for landlines causes this.
I hope this answered your question. If you have any more questions feel free to ask away at Brainly.
Answer: $53,600
Explanation:
Credit sales increase the balance on Accounts Receivables because they represent that people owe the business.
It is therefore included in the formula for calculating the ending balance of Accounts Receivables:
Ending accounts receivables = Beginning accounts receivable + Credit sales in May - Customer payments during May
19,000 = 24,600 + Credit Sales in May - 59,200
Credit Sales in May = 19,000 + 59,200 - 24,600
= $53,600
Answer:
Check the explanation
Explanation:
Particulars Amt
Opening Cash 51907
Add: Cash Received (13400+4500) 17900
Less: Payment to supplier 5500
Less: Operating Expenses Paid 48950
Closing Cash Balance 15357
The output of u. S. Citizens who work in Canada would be included in the: D. Gross domestic product.
<h3>What is gross domestic product?</h3>
Gross domestic product can be defined as the value of goods or products produce within a country at a particular period of time.
If a united State of American citizen work in Canada the output of the United State citizen will be added to the Gross domestic product of Canada.
Therefore the correct option is D.
Learn more about gross domestic product here:brainly.com/question/1383956
#SPJ12
Answer:
The Home owner commenced the action in a state A court ( C )
Explanation:
The Defendant ( the contractor) can decide to transfer the case from a state court to a federal court within the same state in which the case was filled by the The home owner if the federal court has the Jurisdiction to rule on the case
Since the contract was signed in state A under the laws of the state the case is definitely a state case and the Homeowner's move to remand the case to a state court with the argument that the Federal court lacks proper Jurisdiction is in order. The court decision on the matter will be based on the fact that the Homeowner commenced the action in a state A court where the contract was signed.