All categories

2 years ago

What is NOT a reason a new product might fail?

Business

1 answer:

3241004551 [841]2 years ago

6 0

Appropriate channels selected is NOT a reason why a new product might fail.

You might be interested in

Gross Domestic Product equals $1.2 trillion. If consumption equals $690 billion, investment equals $200 billion, and government

4vir4ik [10]

Answer:

imports exceed exports by $50 billion.

Explanation:

Calculation to determine how much imports exceed exports

Gross Domestic Product $1.2 trillion

Less Consumption ($690 billion)

Less Investment ($200 billion)

Less Government spending ($260 billion)

($1.2 trillion-$690 billion-$200 billion-$260 billion)

Then:imports exceed exports by $50 billion

5 0

3 years ago

Assume that the yen/dollar exchange rate quoted in London at 3:00 p.m. is ×120 = $1, and the New York yen/dollar exchange rate a

Viefleur [7K]

Answer:

This question lacks answers

A. currency swap.

B. arbitrage.

C. backwardation.

D. straddle.

The answer is b.

Explanation:

Arbitrage is a common practice used to gain profits from inefficient markets. Since most financial markets are inefficient by nature, dealers and similar business entities that have an interest in this kind of business practice.

The profit in arbitrage is based on the imbalance in the two prices on each market respectively. The term is mainly used for financial markets and various financial instruments (securities, bonds, currencies).

In the example above, the dealer becomes an arbitrageur by making a profit from the difference in the yen/dollar exchange rate in two markets (NY and London.)

8 0

3 years ago

Jose owns a dog whose barking annoys Jose's neighbor Amy. Suppose that the net benefit of owning the dog is worth $400 to Jose a

Alex Ar [27]

Answer: Jose has to pay $600.

Explanation:

Jose has to pay $600 to Jane for her inconvenience.

In Accordance with Coase theorem, when two conflicting parties exist, one has to ‘buy the right’ from the other party.

Which In this scenario or case, Jane has the ‘right to prevent Jose from having a dog’.

Thus, Jose has to pay compensation to Jane so that he can keep his dog and at the same time Jane is also compensated for the inconvenience which may arise later.

5 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Your venture has net income of $600,000 taxable income of $1,000,000 operating profit of $1,200,000 total financial capital incl

Butoxors [25]

Answer:

EVA = -$180,000

Explanation:

given data

net income = $600,000

taxable income of $1,000,000

operating profit = $1,200,000

total financial capital = $9,000,000

tax rate = 40%

WACC = 10%

solution

we get here EVA that is express as

EVA = NOPAT - Invested Capital × WACC ..................1

and here

NOPAT = EBIT × ( 1 - Tax Rate ) .........2

put here value

NOPAT = operating profit × (1 - Tax Rate)

NOPAT =$1,200,000 × (1 - 0.40)

NOPAT =$720,000

so put in equation 1 we get

EVA = NOPAT - Invested Capital × WACC

EVA = $720,000 - $9,000,000 × 10%

EVA = -$180,000

3 0

3 years ago

For 2014, Taxpayer (TP) wants to recognize a deduction. The deduction involves a statute that has not changed since enacted in 1

Vesna [10]

Answer:

Option c. is correct

Explanation:

Under the Golsen rule, the Tax Court must follows the Court of Appeals such that the court of appeals has direct jurisdiction over the taxpayer. The Court is said to reach a decision without calculating the tax when a Tax Court decision is said to be entered under Rule 155.

In this question, The Golsen rule applies here and weakens the legal justification for the deduction

4 0

3 years ago