1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
yanalaym [24]
3 years ago
9

Pls help I will give brainliest !

History
1 answer:
fgiga [73]3 years ago
3 0

Answer: I would support this endeavor, because we are running out of resources on Earth. Colonizing Mars would also open up new jobs on and off Earth. Some would argue that we could better spend that money on helping save our planet rather the colonizing a new one. I would have to say good luck, getting the oil executives and other current un-renewable energy executives to sign up for that one. It would take hundreds of years and more money to switch from where we are now to completely renewable. Also the benefits of the scientific boom from that kind of money being put into those programs would be enormous, and not just in the space exploration. It would also help just about every other scientific field as well.

Explanation:

You might be interested in
Which of the following was agreed upon in the Great Compromise?
Cerrena [4.2K]

D- both A and B would be the answer

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which of these Was a consequence for farmers during the Dust Bowl
erica [24]

Answer: 1:6

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which of the following social changes was a result of the Second Industrial Revolution in the United States?
Hoochie [10]
Do answer choices go with  this question ?
4 0
4 years ago
Why is the mongoose praised in Indian but is hated in indian
blondinia [14]
The story "The Rat and the Mongoose" may help answer this question.
6 0
4 years ago
What did Aristotle mean when he said that we should "avoid the extreme which is more opposed to the mean"
Marianna [84]

Answer:

Aristotle´s words are a call for balance and equanimity in our actions. It is negative or wrong to opt for an extreme solution or an extreme situation; it´s better to avoid it. If we have to choose between two options or two situations, the best we can do is to strike a balance or choose the lesser of two evils, that is, if we have to opt between two bad outcomes, then it is better to choose the one that is the least extreme and is closer to the point of balance. That´s his message.

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which of these countries did NOT fight with the Allied Powers in World War I? A) Italy B) Russia C) France D) Ottoman Empire
    8·2 answers
  • How did the agricultural revolution lead to the industrial revolution
    11·1 answer
  • Which policy was common to the Harding, Coolidge, and Hoover administrations?
    15·1 answer
  • How loose packing different from tight packing
    13·1 answer
  • Describe the key principles of the policy of containment forged by american diplomat George F. Kennan.
    12·1 answer
  • In your opinion, what was the most important change brought by the development of language? (2 things)​
    13·1 answer
  • What do the Aztecs, the Mayans and the Incas all have in common
    6·2 answers
  • Outline the three possible verdicts in a jury trial
    14·2 answers
  • The stamp act ultimately cannot be enforced because
    11·1 answer
  • The Indian nations had always been considered as distinct, independent political communities, retaining their original natural r
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!