1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
lisov135 [29]
3 years ago
6

I need help trying to find what is needed to solve the problem.

Mathematics
1 answer:
goldfiish [28.3K]3 years ago
3 0
I think it would be the answer a or b 
You might be interested in
Evaluate B raised to the second power for B=9
yanalaym [24]
The answer would be 81
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Answer the question ​
guajiro [1.7K]

what is the questionswjjbdbfnjr

6 0
3 years ago
Please help I will make you the brainiest (please no link people)
Andre45 [30]

Answer:

Solution,

Radius(r)=6 cm

Height(h)=20 cm

Volume of cylinder= pi (r)^2 h

=3.14*(6)^2*20

=3.14*36*20

=2260.8 cm^3

Hope it helps

Good luck on your assignment

4 0
3 years ago
Solve for X.Enter the solutions from least to greatest.
FinnZ [79.3K]

Answer:

lesser x= -10.32

greater x= -3.68

Step-by-step explanation:

- 7 +  \sqrt{11}  =  - 3.68

- 7 -  \sqrt{11}  =  - 10.32

4 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Consider the following proposed proof by contradiction that for all positive integers n, 3n > 2.
laila [671]

Answer:

The proof contains a simple direct proof, wrapped inside the unnecessary logical packaging of a proof by contradiction framework.

Step-by-step explanation:

The proof is rigourous and well written, so we discard the second answer.

This is not a fake proof by contradiction: it does not have any logical fallacies (circular arguments) or additional assumptions, like, for example, the "proof" of "All the horses are the same color". It is factually correct, but it can be rewritten as a direct proof.

A meaningful proof by contradiction depends strongly on the assumption that the statement to prove is false. In this argument, we only this assumption once, thus it is innecessary. Other proofs by contradiction, like the proof of "The square root of 2 is irrational" or Euclid's proof of the infinitude of primes, develop a longer argument based on the new assumption, but this proof doesn't.

To rewrite this without the superfluous framework, erase the parts "Suppose that the statement is false" and "The fact that the statement is true contradicts the assumption that the statement is false. Thus, the assumption that the statement was false must have been false. Thus, the statement is true."

7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which is greater 0.75 or 0.9
    11·2 answers
  • What is the decimal equivalent of 56%? a. .056 b. .56 c. .0056 d. 5.60
    12·1 answer
  • Work out the size of angle x 126* 43*
    5·1 answer
  • An accountant makes 57,000 per year. what is the monthly salary
    5·1 answer
  • The Mitchells are renting a boat for the day. It costs $100, plus $20 for each hour. They have to pay for a whole hour even if t
    10·1 answer
  • Samuel is solving the equation 3 (x minus 1) + 4 = 2 minus (x + 3). Which equivalent equations might Samuel use? Check all that
    9·1 answer
  • A manager recorded how many hours each of 11 cashiers worked in a week. Which interval contains the median number of hours worke
    15·1 answer
  • Sergio ate 3.5 cookies. Each cookie contained 5.7 grams of sugar. How many grams of sugar did Sergio eat?
    8·1 answer
  • GEOMETRY PROOFS:
    8·1 answer
  • A recipe for bran muffins calls for 2 1/2 cups of bran flakes. The recipe yields 9 muffins. How much bran flakes should be used
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!