Answer:
90% confidence interval for the population mean is between a lower limit of $92.18 and an upper limit of $107.82.
Step-by-step explanation:
Confidence interval for a population mean is given as mean +/- margin of error (E)
mean = $100
sd = $25.20
n = 30
degree of freedom = n-1 = 30-1 = 29
confidence level (C) = 90% = 0.9
significance level = 1 - C = 1 - 0.9 = 0.1 = 10%
critical value (t) corresponding to 29 degrees of freedom and 10% significance level is 1.699
E = t×sd/√n = 1.699×25.20/√30 = $7.82
Lower limit of population mean = mean - E = 100 - 7.82 = $92.18
Upper limit of population mean = mean + E = 100 + 7.82 = $107.82
90% confidence interval is ($92.18, $107.82)
Answer:
0
Step-by-step explanation:
Separate into two parts
Simplify:
This is for the first fraction
Now for the second fraction:
Add both parts together
To turn this into the said formula, that would become:
Where:
a=0
b=1
c=1
d=3
Any value with an exponent 0 except zero will be equal to 1
Answer:
11 x 15 = 165, so to make 165 cookies, you would need 15 times the milk.
2/3 times 15 = 10
You would need 10 cups of milk to make 165 cookies
8+-10=-2 you multiply and combine the variables and numbers.
Answer:
One
Step-by-step explanation:
Clearly, one triangle can be constructed as the angles 45 and 90 do not exceed 180 degrees. (so "None" is not correct)
To show that only one such triangle exists, you can apply the Angle-Side-Angle theorem for congruence.
Since one triangle can be constructed, it remains to be shown that no additional triangle that is not congruent to the first one can be created: I will use proof by contradiction. Let a triangle ABC be constructed with two angles 45 and 90 degree and one included side of length 1 inch. Suppose, I now construct a second triangle that is different from the first one but still has the same two angles and included side. By applying the ASA theorem which states that two triangles with same two angles and one side included are congruent, I must conclude that my triangle is congruent to the first one. This is a contradiction, hence my original claim could not have been true. Therefore, there is no way to construct any additional triangle that would not be congruent with the first one, and only one such triangle exists.
