Option C is correct because it is a trinomial with a leading coefficient of 3 and a constant term of -5
Step-by-step explanation:
We need to pick the expression that matches this description:
A trinomial with a leading coefficient of 3 and a constant term of -5
First lets explain the terms:
Trinomial: a polynomial having 3 terms
Leading coefficient: The constant value of variable having highest power
Constant term: Having no variable and value cannot be changed.
Now using these definitions, we can choose the correct option
Option A is incorrect because the expression has 2 terms
Option B is incorrect because it is a trinomial but the leading coefficient is -5 and not 3 constant term is 3 and not -5.
Option C is correct because it is a trinomial with a leading coefficient of 3 and a constant term of -5
Option D is incorrect because it is a trinomial but the leading coefficient is 3 but constant term is 1 and not -5.
So, Option C is correct.
Keywords: Algebra
Learn more about Algebra at:
#learnwithBrainly
Answer:
Null hypothesis is: U1 - U2 ≤ 0
Alternative hypothesis is U1 - U2 > 0
Step-by-step explanation:
The question involves a comparison of the two types of training given to the salespeople. The requirement is to set up the hypothesis that type A training leads to higher mean weakly sales compared to type B training.
Let U1 = mean sales by type A trainees
Let U2 = mean sales by type B trainees
Therefore, the null hypothesis (H0) is: U1 - U2 ≤ 0
This implies that type A training does not result in higher mean weekly sales than type B training.
The alternative hypothesis (H1) is: U1 - U2 > 0
This implies that type A training indeed results in higher mean weekly sales than type B training.
96% of 25 is 24 hope this helps
