1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Oliga [24]
3 years ago
12

he state of New Jersey says it is sovereign over certain landfilled portions of Ellis Island. The state of New York disagrees, a

sserting that it is sovereign over the whole of the island. New Jersey brings an action in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York. Should the court hear the case
Law
1 answer:
aleksandr82 [10.1K]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

No, it shouldn't. In the present case, it is a conflict of interest between two states: the states of New York and New Jersey, with respect to Ellis Island and the inter-jurisdictional waters of the Hudson River. Therefore, due to being a controversial matter between two states, the provisions of Article III Section 2 of the United States Constitution, which establishes the original jurisdiction of the Supreme Court in the case. In addition, in case of recourse to the internal courts of a state, a state would be brought to litigate outside its original jurisdiction.

You might be interested in
12. Which Founding Father appointed John Marshall as a Supreme Court Chief Justice?
notsponge [240]
John Adams appointed Marshall as a Supreme Court Chief Justice
3 0
2 years ago
Define the principle of the justice system
xenn [34]
The principal of justice could be described as the moral obligation to act on the basis of fair adjudication between competing claims. As such, it is linked to fairness, entitlement and equality.
3 0
3 years ago
Guys my B just snitched me for stealing at the mall a whole bunch and Graffiti. I’m 13 what do you think my penalty will be. Tha
faust18 [17]

Don't be stupid get a job or something. My mom would beat me with a belt.  

6 0
2 years ago
A man’s wife had an incurable and very painful disease. To put her out of her misery, he killed her.
Burka [1]
Answer: yes

explanation: if she was in so much pain, then she could’ve killed herself instead. Since it didn’t state if the man asked for her permission to kill her, then it was probably his choice
3 0
3 years ago
When the Supreme Court determines the constitutionality of a law, it is using
Margaret [11]
Stare decisis maybe? sorry if wrong
6 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • Who determines whether an individual can act as an expert witness?
    8·1 answer
  • What should you do if you come in close contact during apprehension?
    15·2 answers
  • 1.) Should officers with body-worn cameras be required to announce they are wearing the devices?
    11·1 answer
  • • Do police officers always live up to this Code of Ethics?
    6·1 answer
  • Adjust your rearview and side mirrors:
    10·2 answers
  • I want to be a lawyer:) does anybody have like tips or whatever im only in 8th grade but i want to be prepared lol
    6·1 answer
  • there is a case thats not from your state but it is mandatory auhority in your state, how is this possible
    11·1 answer
  • Senario:
    10·2 answers
  • Imagine you are the chief of police of your local community and have decided to
    11·1 answer
  • Please help !!!!!
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!