1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Oliga [24]
3 years ago
12

he state of New Jersey says it is sovereign over certain landfilled portions of Ellis Island. The state of New York disagrees, a

sserting that it is sovereign over the whole of the island. New Jersey brings an action in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York. Should the court hear the case
Law
1 answer:
aleksandr82 [10.1K]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

No, it shouldn't. In the present case, it is a conflict of interest between two states: the states of New York and New Jersey, with respect to Ellis Island and the inter-jurisdictional waters of the Hudson River. Therefore, due to being a controversial matter between two states, the provisions of Article III Section 2 of the United States Constitution, which establishes the original jurisdiction of the Supreme Court in the case. In addition, in case of recourse to the internal courts of a state, a state would be brought to litigate outside its original jurisdiction.

You might be interested in
Select the correct answer.
scoundrel [369]

Answer:

E

Explanation:

Because its something you can see and hold you can pick it up :)

4 0
3 years ago
What is the exception to the 4th Amendment
9966 [12]

Answer: There is no general exception to the Fourth Amendment warrant requirement in national security cases.

Explanation:

Other well-established exceptions to the warrant requirement include consensual searches, certain brief investigatory stops, searches incident to a valid arrest, and seizures of items in plain view.

3 0
3 years ago
What is the key difference in why the Fourth Amendment does not apply to private security guards as it does to law enforcement a
BartSMP [9]

Answer:

unlawful

Explanation:

no badge holder on guard

6 0
2 years ago
Aceable Driving Test
shutvik [7]

Answer:

A: the total amount it will cover I think

7 0
2 years ago
“Abortion Ruled Unconstitutional by the Supreme Court, Roe v. Wade Overturned”
Tema [17]

Answer:

I believe it is A but it might be wise to wait for another answer

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Compare the text of the United States' first amendment, guaranteeing Freedom of Expression, with the United Kingdom's Human Righ
    6·1 answer
  • What is the difference between probation supervision and intensive probation supervision
    14·1 answer
  • What was the ruling of the case Benett v Jeffreys?
    10·2 answers
  • The purpose of competition policy ​
    13·1 answer
  • The same directions could be printed on a yellow or an orange sign. Why is it important to recognize the difference if you're ju
    11·1 answer
  • Which of the following is NOT included in a final sketch as stated in the
    7·2 answers
  • What is a distance determination? How is this done?
    15·2 answers
  • Would you rather be part of making, enforcing, or interpreting laws? Why?
    6·1 answer
  • Some attorneys contact many experts as a ploy to disqualify them or prevent opposing counsel from hiring them; this practice is
    10·1 answer
  • 2. Share an example of a case where you
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!