1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Oliga [24]
3 years ago
12

he state of New Jersey says it is sovereign over certain landfilled portions of Ellis Island. The state of New York disagrees, a

sserting that it is sovereign over the whole of the island. New Jersey brings an action in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York. Should the court hear the case
Law
1 answer:
aleksandr82 [10.1K]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

No, it shouldn't. In the present case, it is a conflict of interest between two states: the states of New York and New Jersey, with respect to Ellis Island and the inter-jurisdictional waters of the Hudson River. Therefore, due to being a controversial matter between two states, the provisions of Article III Section 2 of the United States Constitution, which establishes the original jurisdiction of the Supreme Court in the case. In addition, in case of recourse to the internal courts of a state, a state would be brought to litigate outside its original jurisdiction.

You might be interested in
What legal behaviour do you think should be illegal?
Ann [662]

Answer:

smoking cigarettes in public .

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
Which amendments protect the rights of the accused?.
ratelena [41]

Answer:

The Sixth Amendment.

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
o you think it is ethical to allow a corporation to escape criminal responsibility for reckless involuntary manslaughter and cri
Anit [1.1K]

No, It is not morally to allow a corporation to escape with criminal culpability since

  • The statistical likelihood of an aide is dependent upon the litigant's co-operation in a high level of connivance with the criminal or the head, but the assistant's duties are related to the defendant's responsibility to assign a person visible of a unique relationship to do to improve.
  • The acting party is also reproachingly in control of its directors with its vicarious duties.
  • In general, it is often a <u>vicarious obligation</u> to adjust <u>criminal culpability</u> in the <u>sensitive working relation</u> in respect of an <u>associate bachelor's degree</u> offense from of the <u>associate's agent</u> or employee to the business on its own.
  • Additional charges for the wrongdoing of the personality are levied by the expert or indicative.
  • <u>Criminal vicarious</u> danger harms the vital statute that folks should be reprehensibly responsible for their leadership but not the direct one of the others.
  • Despite the very fact that accent hazard is a duty for the leadership of directors, the assistant is carrying out a crime opposition, supported by <u>criminal expectations</u> and similarly rejected.
  • Single-species conclusions, which seem to force crook obligations to square this same measure, are also very important for those responsible for their horrendously <u>criminal straightforwardness</u>.
  • A few square models measure the laws which hold people heinously reliable, whilst also their youth dedicate their wrongs to <u>firearms </u>which have <u>guardian areas</u> and to offenses that decry or behaving badly a child.
  • The guardians measure their thinking in all of these ways, for example, by enabling the youth to press their firearms or to be silent.
  • This same <u>legislation advances</u> as long as the pervasiveness of youthful people who commit <u>infringements </u>is <u>steadily prevalent</u>.
  • Associate obligations are deemed to be the responsibility of the <u>assistant </u>when the character in question is complicit in the head; <u>assistant </u>probability forces are the criminal duties of a visible party of an unknown priest with a <u>character </u>on <u>display</u>.
  • Collaborations are vicarious learning bound up in different jurisdictions for violations of the scope of the <u>paintings by experts</u>.
  • The <u>single vicarious obligation</u> is not appreciated, but because of the prevalence of young men who perform violations, the legislation is <u>moving forward</u>.

Learn more:

brainly.com/question/18869319

8 0
3 years ago
When is someone not justified in using deadly force to protect their property?
Lunna [17]
Example: You wake up in the middle of the night and hear rumbling in your living room. You grab a weapon (that could potentially hurt the person). The man/woman is trying to take your TV but drops it and tries to flee when being caught.

You have 2 options.
A) Let him flee.
B) Fire your weapon at him.

Remember: Deadly force is justified if a person unlawfully enters onto property and the property owner reasonably believes that the trespasser is about to commit a felony or do harm to a person on the premises. ... Use of deadly force is never justified to protect PERSONAL PROPERTY other than a dwelling.

Hopefully this example helped.
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Give a name for one of the “projects” used by Enron during the California energy crisis, other than “Get Shorty” which is the ne
Yuri [45]
Name; charli damelio
5 0
4 years ago
Other questions:
  • What are 3 ways in which a legal duty to act arises?​
    13·1 answer
  • There are two general types of evidence, what are they called?
    10·1 answer
  • उपलक्ष्यमा पठाइन शुरु
    12·1 answer
  • Ben has a credit score of 540. How would that be categorized?
    13·2 answers
  • The organ procurement and translate new yorker divides the usa into ____ gerogphic regions
    9·1 answer
  • The American Bar Association prohibits lawyers from considering the nature of their own reputations when setting legal fees for
    8·1 answer
  • If it is it the state who is targeting a group of people, what recourse do they have to achieve justice?
    9·1 answer
  • Which of the following is NOT a step in the communication process?
    8·1 answer
  • When entering a highway from a private driveway you must:<br> -yield to all approaching vehicles.
    7·1 answer
  • The statute of __________ is the state law that sets a time limit on when someone can legally file a collection suit on a past-d
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!