Answer:
C
Explanation:
missing vital context. this is what I assume is correct
Answer:
all of the above
Explanation:
learning skill is to hear,retain and then interpret what is being said
<u>Section 8</u> of the Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act prohibits an escrow agent from compensating any individual for referring customers or accounts
Explanation:
<u>Section 8</u> of <u>Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act</u> prohibits a escrow agent from compensating any individual for referring customers or for any such services performed.The other terms used for this are <u>kickbacks, fee-splitting and unearned fees.
</u>
<u>As per HUD a person who violates the section 8 of Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act can face imprisonment of 1 year and a fine of $ 10000</u>
Considering the legal practice and standards, it is <u>false</u> that in a case involving internet transactions, jurisdiction is proper only when the defendant conducts substantial business in the jurisdiction online.
<h3>What is Jurisdiction in online transactions?</h3>
Jurisdiction online transaction is a legal issue that seeks to solve or justify court jurisdiction over a case or dispute involving a foreign defendant.
In this case, the normal principle state that having a foreign defendant access a website is not satisfactory to establish jurisdiction.
Therefore, for a court to justify exercising jurisdiction over a foreign defendant in Internet-based transactions, there must be multiple contacts in addition to the accessibility of a website.
Hence, in this case, it is concluded that the correct answer is "False."
Learn more about Jurisdiction of court here: brainly.com/question/10377896