1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Llana [10]
2 years ago
8

Clause of the constitution from which the implied powers of congress are derived is called

Law
1 answer:
ipn [44]2 years ago
8 0

Answer:

Located in Article I, Section 8, Clause 18 of the U.S. Constitution, the Elastic Clause

Explanation:

The Elastic Clause, also known as the “Necessary and Proper Clause,” is perhaps the most important clause in the U.S. Constitution, though it is also the most controversial. The Clause gives Congress the authority to use powers not explicitly named in the Constitution, if they are necessary in order to perform its responsibilities as outlined in the Constitution. In other words, Congress may do whatever is “necessary and proper” to do its job. To explore this concept, consider the following Elastic Clause definition.

Elastic Clause is so named because of the flexibility it gives to Congress when it comes to exercising its enumerated powers. Like an elastic band, the Clause can be metaphorically “stretched” to meet Congress’ needs, or “contracted” to rein in Congress, if necessary. The Elastic Clause specifically states that Congress shall have the authority.

You might be interested in
A standard serving of alcohol can be compared to ...
ahrayia [7]
The answer is A.serving size on a food label
6 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
In the U.S.,The South Carolina state constitution is the supreme law of the land?
Artemon [7]
I’m pretty sure it’s false but not 100% sure
8 0
2 years ago
Why am i simping on anime girls
aleksley [76]

Answer:

lol

Explanation:

because we are wierd

7 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
There is no objective 'truth' in morality." – do you agree or disagree? Why or Why not? (Write your answer between 200-250 words
Sladkaya [172]

Answer:

This is an answer that requires a personal opinion. I will give you my opinion with an explanation so you can understand it and if you want, you can modify it.

Explanation:

I agree.

What this question proposes to us is that there is no absolute truth when it comes to morality.

There is no one truth about morality that applies to everyone as if it were a rule. And this happens because there are many sets of subjective norms, beliefs, values and customs that direct or guide the behavior of groups of people in society and that vary depending on each person.

Something that is moral for a certain cultural group may not be for another in another part of the world.

That is why in my personal opinion I agree that there is no objective 'truth' in morality. "

8 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How might the case of Gideon v. Wainwright affect the work of a prosecutor?
zhannawk [14.2K]

Answer:

b. Prosecutors need to watch the details guaranteed by the Sixth Amendment, such as ensuring a speedy trial, impartial jury, informed of accusation, etc.

6 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • Elin contracts to buy six cases of vintage Fertile Valley wine from Grapes & Vines Winery for $1,200. The contract states th
    5·1 answer
  • The United States Constitution and _____________________________________ establish the fundamental principles and rules by which
    9·1 answer
  • In 2008, Congress passed the Americans with Disabilities Amendments Act. What was the scope of the changes?
    6·1 answer
  • A contract between a business and a state recognizing the business as an artificial person is known as the​
    11·1 answer
  • What is law and where does law come from ?
    6·1 answer
  • Go to the internet -Please include a reference in the discussion post of your case!
    7·1 answer
  • Can someone give me topics that I can use to a create a bill for a class project
    10·2 answers
  • SORRY GUYS HELP ME WITH THIS ONE PLZ
    10·1 answer
  • Câu 1 (3,0 điểm) Các nhận định sau là Đúng hay Sai? Giải thích ngắn gọn
    7·1 answer
  • the supreme court has ruled that it is unconstitutional to execute someone who committed his/her crime when he/she was under 18
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!