I would like to say C, because they were imperialistic power who sought out many colonies through out the world and they were heavily militaristic about these colonies. But I would wait for a second answer before you choose C, as I am unsure of this.
Answer:
The policies of President Richard Nixon were different from his predecessor such as Kennedy and Johnson because Nixon focused on Foreign policies.
Carter's foreign policies were different from Nixon.
Explanation:
President Richard Nixon was the 37th President of the United States. He succeeded Lyndon B. Johnson, the 36th President.
The policies of Nixon were very much different from those of his successors such as President Kennedy and Johnson as Nixon tried to focus more on Foreign Policies than Domestic ones. In his Presidency, US was able to come to the place of peace with USSR, China, etc. He was a member of Republican Party. He was the only President in US's history to have resign from the office for being involved in Watergate scandal.
The policies of Jimmy Carter were different from those of Nixon's policies. Jimmy Carter was the 39th President of the States. Carter began his office with promising policies which he was unable to fulfil. But he still managed to work on certain of his policies. His foreign policy was different from Nixon's foreign policy as he denied to agree with the wrong.
The answer to this question is <span>To engage the enemy
According to his philosophy, a nation fleet needs to create as much destruction as possible among enemy's fleet on the front line.
By doing this, they will provide a way for the rest of the army to create control upon the water territory.</span>
Since then the Great Wall was built, rebuilt to protect the northern borders of the Chinese Empire from the Hun's and Mongolian attacks during the rule of successive dynasties.
The best option would be that "<span>The U.S. imposed a treaty that forced Latin American countries to democratize or face crippling sanctions," since it was never in American's best interest to force the democratization of the region. </span>
