The defense may present evidence in an adjudicatory hearing.
This statement is false
Hope this helps
Good and bad pointsGood points of duty-based ethics<span><span>emphasises the value of every human being<span>Duty-based ethical systems tend to focus on giving equal respect to all human beings.This provides a basis for human rights - it forces due regard to be given to the interests of a single person even when those are at odds with the interests of a larger group.</span></span><span>says some acts are always wrong<span>Kantian duty-based ethics says that some things should never be done, no matter what good consequences they produce. This seems to reflect the way some human beings think.Rossian duty-based ethics modified this to allow various duties to be balanced, which, it could be argued, is an even better fit to the way we think.</span></span><span>provides 'certainty'<span>Consequentialist ethical theories bring a degree of uncertainty to ethical decision-making, in that no-one can be certain about what consequences will result from a particular action, because the future is unpredictable.Duty-based ethics don't suffer from this problem because they are concerned with the action itself - if an action is a right action, then a person should do it, if it's a wrong action they shouldn't do it - and providing there is a clear set of moral rules to follow then a person faced with a moral choice should be able to take decisions with reasonable certainty.Of course things aren't that clear cut. Sometimes consequentialist theories can provide a fair degree of certainty, if the consequences are easily predictable.Furthermore, rule-based consequentialism provides people with a set of rules that enable them to take moral decisions based on the sort of act they are contemplating.</span></span><span>deals with intentions and motives<span>Consequentialist theories don't pay direct attention to whether an act is carried out with good or bad intentions; most people think these are highly relevant to moral judgements.Duty-based ethics can include intention in at least 2 ways...If a person didn't intend to do a particular wrong act - it was an accident perhaps - then from a deontological point of view we might think that they hadn't done anything deserving of criticism. This seems to fit with ordinary thinking about ethical issues.Ethical rules can be framed narrowly so as to include intention.</span></span></span>Bad points of duty-based ethics<span><span>absolutistDuty-based ethics sets absolute rules. The only way of dealing with cases that don't seem to fit is to build a list of exceptions to the rule.</span><span>allows acts that make the world a less good place<span>Because duty-based ethics is not interested in the results it can lead to courses of action that produce a reduction in the overall happiness of the world.Most people would find this didn't fit with their overall idea of ethics:</span></span></span>
...it is hard to believe that it could ever
Answer:
The ocean would eventually become smaller in size
Explanation:
The earth is covered by about 70% of the water bodies. This water is regulated by maintaining a variety of processes, and this commonly forms a cycle, which is known as the water cycle.
The surface runoff and the flow of groundwater are two of the important processes that add water to the oceans and seas. If these processes are reduced then it will directly affect the oceans. It is because the water will not be contributed to the seas and oceans, thus there will be a reduction in the amount of total water in the oceans. Therefore, it will eventually lead to a reduction in the size of the oceans.
The name of the study which aims to modify existing psychological theory related to personality traits would be considered a:.
<h3>What is Basic Research?</h3>
This refers to the type of research which aims to improve already existing theories for the purpose of understanding them better.
With this in mind, we can see that basic research is the name which is given to the type of research which aims to modify and improve research about personality traits.
Read more about basic research here:
brainly.com/question/1542346
Answer:
avoid contact with the outgroup
Explanation:
Some experts have suggested that different types of prejudice may arise because of different emotional responses to the target group. From this perspective, prejudice arising from guilt may result in behaviors that try to avoid contact with the outgroup.
When an individual have a sense of guilt towards a group he is not a part of, he tends to isolate himself from such group. This behavior is not out of hate as may be interpreted by others but out of guilt. For example, after the abolition of slavery, some Europeans found it hard to associate with the free blacks, this type of prejudice is most likely linked to a feeling of guilt.
