<span>Personally, I would choose this topic:
Speech related to violence: You might want to write about limitations on freedom of speech related to violence. Speech that incites violence is not covered by the First Amendment and can result in prosecution in the United States. However, speech that merely supports violence as a political option is not considered a crime.
Part A: As this topic is something that is more of a national issue than one within one single school, I would address the letter to a member of congress. Addressing it to anyone else would do little to actually address the issue.
Part B:
Stance: While freedom of speech allows one to express their opinions publicly, those who engage in speech promoting violence, or hate speech, negatively impact society as a whole as well as on an individual level. As such, speech promoting violence should not be considered under the First Amendment, and those individuals who choose to engage in it should be persecuted.
Evidence: Recent KKK & Antifa conflict in Charlottesville,
</span>
Answer:
Contemporary is a more rational way of thinking that is the difference. Now a days no people don stick to the idea of fate they are more realistic now and come up with other ways for explaining things.
Explanation:
Answer:
C. cause and Affect
Explanation:
actcion would be the cause and affect would be the consequence
A.) should be the correct answer because if she has an interview from King that means that she is looking from his prospective. in answer D.) it would be swapped you would need Gandhi´s prospective not King´s
hope it helps
Hey there!
<span>Benjamin Franklin _______ regarded as one of the most infuential people in the history of the United States.
Answer: Is
Hope this helps
Have a great day (:
</span>
