Answer:
Education is the result of the educational process that implies preparation to transform a reality from the knowledge, skills, values and abilities that are acquired at each stage and throughout life. Development is achieved through the education of critical and creative people who generate new knowledge and respond from a historical-cultural perspective to present and future problems, transforming and enriching society.
Explanation:
The progress of humanity largely depends on education. Educating is a process and as such implies the idea of advancement and progress. The education of individuals implies the end achieved, that is, we speak of social action (educating) on individuals (social beings), enabling them (capacity development) to understand their reality and transform it in a conscious, balanced and efficient way so that they can act as socially responsible people. Education therefore implies the idea of optimization; that is to say, whoever tries to educate others (heteroeducation) or who tries to educate herself/himself (self-education) assumes the idea of the improvement of the social individual, therefore this constitutes a function of society.
Answer:
Akan tribe
Explanation:
Rice and peas was adopted from the Akan tribe hailing from Ghana and Ivory Coast in West Africa. The dish, which still exists in those countries today, is known as Waakye and of course consists of the usual rice and beans.
HAVE A GOOD DAY
CAN I HAVE BRAIN
By measuring the Galvanic skin response, Dr. Laub is trying to avoid the problem of:
<h3>What are demand characteristics?</h3>
Demand characteristics are a form of behavior that participants in a research work exhibit. If they are able to fathom the cues in the research, they often tend to change the way that they behave.
If they change the way they behave, accurate results will not be obtained. So, this issue must be avoided at all costs and that is why Dr. Laub measures the Galvanic skin response.
Learn more about demand characteristics here:
brainly.com/question/17188674
#SPJ1
Off the top of my head, without seeing the article, I can tell you that in earlier history the ideas of women's bodies and how they should dress have changed a lot. In very early times, such as the 1400s when Columbus first discovered America, women wore long white gowns, like dresses, and hoods. These were called petticoats, and sometimes they wore stockings and garters, etc. In later dates, such as the 1800s, women were wearing dressing, where their breasts showed, and wore corsets. In the beginning of the 1900s the clothing style changed. Women begin to coverup more. By 1950-1960, women were wearing long dresses that pretty much covered their entire body. This was when women were mostly "housewives" and "baby boomers." By 1970 and 1980 women were wearing pants and jeans with tops that either covered them all the way and were baggy or they wore tank tops and tube tops. Now we see women wearing all types of clothing that don't cover up very much. But back in the 1950s, 1960s, and even some of the 1970s you would never see half naked women advertised on TV, billboards, etc. I think, if I'm not mistaken it was mid 1970 to 1980 where women were finally seen advertised in bikini's and underwear, but the underwear were more like "granny panties" and the bras were covering a lot more. Now you can see full bikini's and bras like Victoria Secret.
<span>During the French Revolution, the National Assembly existed from June 17 to July 9, 1789. Initially, the Assembly announced (and for the most part probably believed) itself to be operating in the interests of King Louis XVI as well as those of the people. In theory, royal authority still prevailed and new laws continued to require the king's consent.</span>
