As with many cultures, a person’s quality of life depended in many ways on their rank within the social structure.
Two Romans living at the same time in the same city could have very different lives.
Rich…
For wealthy Romans, life was good. They lived in beautiful houses –
often on the hills outside Rome, away from the noise and the smell. They
enjoyed an extravagant lifestyle with luxurious furnishings, surrounded
by servants and slaves to cater to their every desire. Many would hold
exclusive dinner parties and serve their guests the exotic dishes of the
day.
…and poor
Poorer Romans, however, could only dream of such a life. Sweating it out
in the city, they lived in shabby, squalid houses that could collapse
or burn at any moment. If times were hard, they might abandon newborn
babies to the streets, hoping that someone else would take them in as a
servant or slave.
Poor in wealth but strong in numbers, they were the Roman mob, who
relaxed in front of the popular entertainment of the time – chariot races between opposing teams, or gladiators fighting for their life, fame and fortune.
Although their lives may have been different, they did have some things
in common. In any Roman family life, the head of the household was a
man. Although his wife looked after the household, he controlled it. He
alone could own property. Only he decided the fate of his children and
who they would marry.
There were other traditions that all Romans shared. Whatever their
individual circumstances, all Romans observed certain practices at
dinner time, the main meal of the day. Although they might eat very
different food, they ate it in roughly the same way.
And Romans of all classes made a point of visiting the baths
after work each day. There they would mix freely with their fellow
citizens, exercising, washing and chatting. To citizens, the baths made
them feel superior to the rest of the world – they made them feel Roman.
<span>The fall of Atlanta, Georgia was made possible through the
skillful campaign of Union General William T. Sherman. Politically, Sherman’s victory boosted the
North’s morale and it won President Lincoln a second term beating former Union
general George McClellan who advocated a truce with the Confederacy. Sherman continued to wreak havoc during his
campaign and it wore down the Confederacy.
The Union was now energized and determined to win the war. As Sherman destroyed resources in the South,
Grant pinned Lee in Petersburg. Morale
in the Confederacy weakened as soldiers started to desert and eventually the
South surrendered.</span>
Question:
The question is incomplete. It can be found in search engines. However, kindly find the complete question in the attachment below.
Answer / Explanation:
It should be noted that what is being displayed by google is :
Standers Error of Population Means (SEμ₁ - μ₂) = √σ₁² / η₁ + σ₂² / η₂
The equation above gives the standard error for population mean. However, it does not give the standard population error for two sample mean so therefore, we can comfortably say that the equation
(SEμ₁ - μ₂) = √σ₁² / η₁ + σ₂² / η₂ is not wrong.
However, moving forward,
the correct equation for standard error for two sample mean is:
(SEε₁ - ε₂) = √ Sp² ( 1 / η₁ + 1 / η₂ )
On stating the above equation, It should be understood that the equation above has given the standard error for two sample mean when the population variance are assumed to be equal thus the standard deviations of the two population are assumed to be equal.
So in conclusion, we can say that the correct statement is that Greek letters are usually used in the equations for population parameters whereas Latin letters are usually used in the equation for sample statistics.
Thus, we can say that Latin letters are usually used in the equations for population parameters,
while Greek letters are usually used in the equation for sample statistics is incorrect.
Answer:
The term which best describes "when a group or person has power or legal authority over a topic or area" is:
3. Jurisdiction.
Explanation:
Jurisdiction refers to the lawful authority given to a person or institution to govern or legislate, exercise authority, or control decisions or judgments. Such authorities are usually exercisable within a specific geographic area, topic, and/or over certain types of legal cases. This means that the given authority is not universally blanket. Instead, it is limited to a particular area, topic, or issue.