Warmup 2/16/21(create a table to compare the 2)

Mathematics

1 answer:

amid [387]2 years ago

5 0

The 1st one because you get more money out of it

You might be interested in

Can somebody please help me solve problem 16 .

N76 [4]

Answer:

i think it`s $35

Step-by-step explanation:

Because 80 divided by 2 = 40 and the problem says to subtract 5 so I believe the answer is $35.

4 0

2 years ago

Anton will be constructing a segment bisector with a compass and straightedge, while Maxim will be constructing an angle bisecto

elena-14-01-66 [18.8K]

A bisector is a line that divides either a line or an angle into two proportionate parts or angles. Thus, Anton's bisector would divide the segment into two equal parts, while Maxim's bisector would divide the angle into two equal angles.

The similarities between their construction are:

Intersecting arcs through which the bisector would pass are required.
The arcs are dawn using the same radius of any measure.
The edges of the arc of the given angle, and the ends of the segment are used as centers.

The differences between their construction are:

Anton has to draw two intersecting arcs above and below the segment. While Maxim would draw two intersecting arcs within the lines forming the angles.
Anton's bisector would be perpendicular to the segment, while Maxim's bisector would be at an angle which is half of the initial angle.

Visit: brainly.com/question/17247176

3 0

2 years ago

Find the value. A. 1 B. 2 C. 3 D. 0.5

Ksju [112]

The cube root is 1
The Answer is A. 1

4 0

2 years ago

The owner of a cattle ranch would like to fence in a rectangular area of 3000000 m^2 and then divide it in half with a fence dow

Reika [66]

If you notice the picture below, the amount of fencing, or perimeter, that will be used will be 3w + 2l

now $\bf \begin{cases}
A=l\cdot w\\\\\
A=3000000\\
----------\\
3000000=l\cdot w\\\\
\frac{3000000}{w}=l
\end{cases}\qquad thus
\\\\\\
P=3w+2l\implies P=3w+2\left( \cfrac{3000000}{w} \right)\implies P=3w+\cfrac{6000000}{w}
\\\\\\
P=3w+6000000w^{-1}\\\\
-----------------------------\\\\
now\qquad \cfrac{dP}{dw}=3-\cfrac{6000000}{w^2}\implies \cfrac{dP}{dw}=\cfrac{3w^2-6000000}{w^2}
\\\\\\
\textit{so the critical points are at }
\begin{cases}
0=w^2\\\\
0=\frac{3w^2-6000000}{w^2}
\end{cases}$

solve for "w", to see what critical points you get, and then run a first-derivative test on them, for the minimum

notice the $0=w^2\implies 0=w$ so. you can pretty much skip that one, though is a valid critical point, the width can't clearly be 0

so.. check the critical points on the other

8 0

2 years ago

A sheet of construction paper is 9 inches long and 11 inches wide. How many 1- inch squares of paper can cut out one sheet of pa

Serggg [28]

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation: 9*11=99

8 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers