The Aztecs, Incas, and Chinese, all had well developed civilizations, and they all used labor force or tributary system. All of them though has different systems and requirements in this department.
The Aztecs had lot of conquered people. They required tribute in the form of people for sacrifice. As the Aztecs has Gods that were very thirsty for human blood, in order to not sacrifice themselves, the Aztecs were taking people for the other tribes and sacrificed them.
The Inca system of labor force seem to have been the most just one. In this system, everyone, apart from the emperor, had to work for the good of everyone and for the good of themselves. Everyone lived in same homes, wore the same clothes, and worked the same types of jobs.
In China, the tribute system was based on forced labor of the people that were conquered. They had to work, produce certain goods, and give part of those goods or part of the profit from those goods to the governing bodies.
According to quizlet.com "North: factories, cities, small farms, immigration communities, no need for slavery, a house was the basis for northern power, more railroads<span>South: slave labor, plantations, cotton, few immigrants, senate basis for political power, few railroads"
Hope this helps.</span>
Answer:
First, a Representative sponsors a bill.
The bill is then assigned to a committee for study.
If released by the committee, the bill is put on a calendar to be voted on, debated or amended.
If the bill passes by simple majority (218 of 435), the bill moves to the Senate.
In the Senate, the bill is assigned to another committee and, if released, debated and voted on.
If the Senate makes changes, the bill must return to the House for concurrence.
The resulting bill returns to the House and Senate for final approval.
The President then has 10 days to veto the final bill or sign it into law.
Hope this helped! :)
Explanation:
Um The Soviet Union's collapse not only threw economic systems and trade relations throughout Eastern Europe into a tailspin
Over speculation means to over "guess." eg, majority of the people feel the stock market will go up, so they greedily buy, when in reality it's the peak already and stock market prices will drop soon.
