At the level of 0.05% significance we can not reject the psychologist's claim. His claim is supported.
Explanation:
When a researcher undertakes a project to do research firstly he takes some random samples. Sample is definite a small group of numbers assume to represent the whole population. Suppose a researcher wants to do research on married couples to find the trend of divorce among them. For that reason he will randomly choose some of the couples and will draw conclusions that inter personal communication reduce the chances of divorce.
Now to establish this experiment as a fact he needs to go through a test of level of significance. Where he will get the result that his statement is established or rejected.
Samuel Adams and Joseph Warren
Answer: Malik's approach best illustrates: TRIAL AND ERROR PROBLEM SOLVING.
Explanation: Trial and error problem solving involves a process whereby to find a solution to a problem, many possible solutions are tried and the researcher learns from mistakes until a way is found. This method is characterized by repeated, varied attempts which are continued until success.
2) Either regulatory or antitrust. I haven't taken econ (except for Academic Decathlon Econ), so I might be wrong on this one.
3) <span>Blake Mycoskie
</span>4) Joseph Unahue because all the others invented their own products.
5) Demand for avocados would increase, causing prices to decrease. Look at the supply vs demand curve. They're inverse of one another. Basic econ
6) <span>the cost of luxury items like jewelry increases. if it's a luxury item, the supply will never increase; it will remain the same. but if there is less demand for it, then the cost will go up so that shop owners can pay off their bills.
7 and 8 aren't showing up for me so I think you typed too much in the problem.
Hope that helps. </span>