I believe the answer is that European powers drew up new political borders in the region without consulting political, cultural, or historic realities.
Answer:
In a situation like this:
Marian’s day never seems to end. She has to deal with carpooling, traffic delays, finding a parking place at her job, working through lunch, and then coming home to cook, clean, and help with homework.
Marian is experiencing B. microstressors.
Explanation:
Microstressors is the concept to define or identify different "has less" that involve a problem-solving execution that obstacles the achievement of a task or situations that might be followed one by the other without time to rest. They are one of the major contributors to high anxiety and stress levels. However, it requires better planning or delegation to be solved without the stress implied.
Answer:
a. The Equal Protection Clause is a clause from the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution. The clause provides that "nor shall any State [...] deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws".
Its purpose is to apply substantially more constitutional restrictions against the states than had applied before the Civil War. Hence, in Shaw v. Reno, 509 U.S. 630 (1993), Supreme Court held that redistricting based on race must be held to a standard of strict scrutiny under the equal protection clause while bodies doing redistricting must be conscious of race to the extent that they must ensure compliance with the Voting Rights Act.
While in the case of Easley v. Cromartie, 532 U.S. 234 (2001), Supreme Court held that the State violated the Equal Protection Clause in drawing the 1997 boundaries was based on clearly erroneous findings.
b. In the case of Easley v. Cromartie, an appeal from the decision given in hunt v. Cromartie was filed in the supreme court of the United States by Easley. In hunt v. Cromartie, the court held that the legislature of North Carolina did not use the factor of race while drawing the boundaries in the twelfth congressional district,1992. It was held by the court that the legislature did not violate the equal protection clause of the constitution and no evidence to prove that legislature set its boundaries on a racial basis rather than a political basis.
In Easley v Cromartie the appeal was that drawing the boundaries for voting violated the equal protection clause of the constitution. The supreme court of the United States held that the decision of the district court is erroneous because it actually relied upon racial factors and this is not in the interest of the state.
In Shaw v. Reno the court concluded that the plan of North Carolina tried to segregate the voters on the basis of race.
Answer:
A higher standard of living for the middle class was increasingly identified with the ability to purchase goods and products that were produced on a mass scale.
Explanation: After the Industrial Revolution, products were able to be both produced AND purchased on a mass scale by society.
The high quantity of a variety of quality goods readily available to citizens for purchase, with less labor from humans required due to the use of machinery to lighten the process, greatly increased the standard of living.
I think it’s D not for sure
