Answer:
B) -0.98
Step-by-step explanation:
Correlation coefficient is usually denoted with numbers ranging from 1 to -1. Automatically, this eliminates option C) as our possible answer, since -1.43 is outside the range.
The trend shown in the scatter plot describes a negative relationship because, as the values in the Y-axis decreases, the values at the X-axis increases. The possible correlation coefficient we are likely to get is one that is negative. This eliminates option A and option and option D is our possible correlation coefficient for the scatter plot given since both values are positive.
Option B) -0.98, best represents the correlation coefficient of the given scatter plot. Since the points on the scatter plot seem closely aligned on a straight line, a negative value if -0.98 is mostly the possible one to get.
All you have to do is multiply 2.3 by 13 together to get 29.9. Then you would subtract that by the total volume which would get 107.64. That's the width.
Answer:
18 L
Step-by-step explanation:
Given : she must mix a solution of 67% herbicide with a solution of 46% herbicide to form 42 liters of a 55% solution.
To Find: How much of the 67% solution must she use?
Let x = amount of 67% solution needed
Then 42-x=amount of 46% solution needed
Now we know that the pure herbicide in the 67% solution
So, pure herbicide = (0.67x)
The amount of pure herbicide in the 46% solution (0.46(42-x))
Now 42 liters of a 55% solution = (0.46(42-x))
So,
Amount of 67% solution + Amount of 46% solution = 42 liters of a 55% solution
⇒0.67x+0.46(42-x)=0.55*42
⇒0.67x+19.32-0.46x=23.1
⇒0.21x=3.78
⇒
⇒x = 18 liters
Hence she use 18 liters of the 67% solution
4(5)+4(3)+3(2)=$38 total cost =$38
Answer:
The combined score was 191
Explanation:
91 (Colin’s score) + 9 (how many more Brian had than Colin) = 100 (Brian’s score)
91 (Colin’s score) + 100 (Brian’s score) = 191 (combined score)
