1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Lilit [14]
3 years ago
9

How did the Industrial Revolution impact American economy? Question 6 options: The economy remained mostly industrial based. The

economy became more industrial and less agricultural based. The economy remained mostly agriculturally based. The economy became more agricultural and less industrial based.
History
1 answer:
xeze [42]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

I would say the economy became more industrial. If not that then it remained industrial. Honestly both seem to work. I'm not a 100% but I thought it was best for u to receive an answer sooner

You might be interested in
WILL GIVE BRAINLILEST<br> What were the 4 causes of WWI?
Ugo [173]

Answer:

there was 5 causes of WWl

they are Militarism, Alliances, Nationalism, Imperialism, and Assassination.

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
explain how the Wilmot Proviso was so controversial in raising the debate over the slave issue again to such intense levels.
Pachacha [2.7K]

The Whigs faced a different scenario. The victory of James K. Polk (Democrat) over Henry Clay (Whig) in the 1844 presidential election had caught the southern Whigs by surprise. The key element of this defeat, which carried over into the congressional and local races in 1845 and 1846 throughout the South, was the party's failure to take a strong stand favoring Texas annexation. Southern Whigs were reluctant to repeat their mistakes on Texas, but, at the same time, Whigs from both sections realized that victory and territorial acquisition would again bring out the issue of slavery and the territories. In the South in particular, there was already the realization, or perhaps fear, that the old economic issues that had defined the Second Party System<span> were already dead. Their political goal was to avoid any sectional debate over slavery which would expose the sectional divisions within the party.</span>After an earlier attempt to acquire Texas by treaty had failed to receive the necessary two-thirds approval of the Senate, the United States annexed the Republic of Texas by a joint resolution of Congress that required simply a majority vote in each house of Congress. President John Tyler signed the bill on March 1, 1845, a few days before his term ended. As many expected, the annexation led to war with Mexico. After the capture of New Mexico and California in the first phases of the war, the political focus shifted to how much territory would be acquired from Mexico. The key to this was the determination of the future status of slavery in any new territory.

Both major political parties had labored long to keep divisive slavery issues out of national politics. The Democrats had generally been successful in portraying those within their party attempting to push a purely sectional issue as extremists that were well outside the normal scope of traditional politics.[2] However, midway through Polk's term, Democratic dissatisfaction with the administration was growing within the Martin Van Buren, or Barnburner, wing of the Democratic Party over other issues. Many felt that Van Buren had been unfairly denied the party's nomination in 1844 when southern delegates resurrected a convention rule, last used in 1832, requiring that the nominee had to receive two-thirds of the delegate votes. Many in the North were also upset with the Walker tariff which reduced the tariff rates; others were opposed to Polk's veto of a popular river and harbor improvements bill, and still others were upset over the Oregon settlement with Great Britain where it appeared that Polk did not pursue the northern territory with the same vigor he used to acquire Texas. Polk was seen more and more as enforcing strict party loyalty primarily to serve southern interests. Hope This Helps! Can I have Brainliest? Please:)

7 0
3 years ago
Mark each statement if it was a factor in the decline of Sumer.
trapecia [35]
Actually every single one is correct, A<B<C they all are factors in the decline of Sumer. 
4 0
3 years ago
When the War of Austrian Succession spilled over into the British colonies in North America, what was the conflict largely about
Zarrin [17]
The war in North America was called King George's war. It happened because as Europeans fought each other, the fighting also transferred to the colonies and this war became the third of the 4 French-Indian wars.
<span />
7 0
3 years ago
What name was given to colonists who were
Crazy boy [7]

Answer: <u><em>Loyalist</em></u>

Explanation:

The name loyalist actually originated from the colonist who refused to go against the British rule and remained on their side with support. Loyalists were often spies for Great Britain aswell, with the word "loyal" being the base word.

5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • How did Marco Polo's impression of China compare with the lives of most Chinese citizens?
    12·2 answers
  • What did Prince henry from Portugal sponser and why?
    11·1 answer
  • Which of these court decisions is an example of judicial review?
    7·1 answer
  • THIS IS OKLAHOMA HISTORY.
    8·2 answers
  • How did Iraq change the face of modern warfare?
    5·1 answer
  • What was the idea behind the Victory Garden
    8·1 answer
  • On a tour of several states, you discover a county governed under a state law that permits home rule. The county chooses its own
    9·1 answer
  • Explain why women are considered America's best kept secret to winning the war?
    12·2 answers
  • The universal spirit created many smaller deities to do its work in the
    5·1 answer
  • The changing nature of the united states of americas involvement in vietnam at different stages between 1957 and 1973
    11·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!