The agreement made between different companies to charge the same amount for products or to not sell the products below a fixed price is known as <u>price-fixing.</u><u />
What are the risk options ?
Answer:
he was discriminated solely based on his sexual orientation.
Explanation:
The Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 stated that all employers in united states are prohibited to discriminate their employees based on race, religion, gender, national origin, and sexual orientation.
You do not need to be married for your sexual orientation to be acknowledged by the The Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 . You just need to proof that any of the factors above are the reason why you're discriminated against.
In Qiang case, he could tried to find witness by talking to other employees or find a recorded email/messages that indicates his boss mistreatment toward him. If there are enough employees who came out as witnesses, he could build a strong enough case to gain support in the court.
Based on the fact that ActioNOW and Becca entered into an oral contract where Becca agrees to work on a project for ActioNOW for eighteen months, the enforcers of this contract are d. none of the choices.
<h3>Who can enforce this contract?</h3>
This transaction between Becca and ActioNOW was an oral contract which means that it falls under the Statute of Frauds. However, for an oral contract to be enforceable under this Statute, the goods or services exchanged have to be less then $500 in value.
The services or goods also have to be less than 1 year in duration. Because Becca and ActioNow agreed for a contract of 18 months which is more than a year, this contract is not enforceable under the Statute of Frauds and so the government cannot enforce this contract.
Options include:
- a. ActioNOW.
- b. Becca.
- c. any third party, such as ActioNOW’s clients.
- d. none of the choices
Find out more on the Statute of Frauds at brainly.com/question/14854791
#SPJ1
