Answer:
The Texas Railroad Commission
Here are the common technical causes of analysis paralysis:
Analysis barely gives a clear answer as to what discussion is best.
The purpose of the analysis is not sufficiently clear, so analysts produce data that doesn't shed any light on what action to take.
Answer:
Macmillana's GDP is less sensitive economic fluctuations than Bloedelo's GDP. Two reasons account for this:
1) The keynesian multiplier is smaller.
The keynesian multiplier tells us about the sensitivity of GDP to increases in domestic expenditure (consumption, investment or government purchases). If the keynesian multiplier is small, then, GDP will be less sensitive to fluctuations in aggregate expenditure.
2) Macmillana's economy has implemented automatic stabilizers, while Bloedelo's economy has not.
Automatic Stabilizers are government policies meant to reduce fluctuations in GDP. The two most common automatic stabilizers are: income taxes and unemployment benefits.
Automatic Stabilizers reduce the kenyensian multiplier, dampening Macmillana's GDP sensitivity to fluctuations even more.
Answer:
50,400
Explanation:
Using application of total expectation, E;
N= Number of policy holders who have zero accidents in one month
P= Probability
N|Low = 400
N|High=600
P|Low=0.9
P|High=0.8
Therefore E = (N|Low*P|Low)+(N|High*P|High)
E=(400*0.9)+(600*0.8)
E=360+480
E=840
Then Total bonus for the year B
B= E*12*5
B=840*12*5
B=50,400
You could provide large print or braille materials for her.
