Think of a policy as a plan. We will do B if A happens. The best example I can think of is the policy that the United States does not negotiate with terrorists. That is a policy, but it has been broken, for example, when POW were traded from Guantanimo Bay for US soldiers taken hostage.
<span>A law is legally binding. For example, the President of the United States can veto bills. That isn't a policy. The President doesn't have a guideline that he can veto bills and Congress can't say we will break that "policy" this time. That is the law so they must allow it. </span>
<span>In short, </span>policies<span> are </span>not<span> legally binding. They are "plans". </span>
<span>Laws </span><span>are </span><span>legally binding. They are final and concrete, for the purposes of this discussion.</span>
It would be (C) Spain and France.
Yes it did have a positive impact because they were allowed to vote.
<span>C. at the Yalta Conference is the answer</span>