Answer: Anger is an ineffective way for people get their points across. The following reasons are why. In the protests that have been going on many people have been showing their anger by robbing and vandalizing businesses by doing this they not only are ruining the city but also getting themselves in trouble by getting arrested. Martin Luther King Jr not once used violence to get his point across but he instead protested peacefully and with peace and he inspired people to follow him and they did at the end he changed many people's minds and got his point across. This shows that people don't need violence or anger to get there point through because there have been true examples showing us that you could still get what you want without getting angry. The last reason why I think that anger is ineffective is the following. Let me give this example, if you were to see a person who would yell, always be angry and want to start a fight with someone and they told you that there way of doing things was right would you listen to them? On the other hand if you were to see a person who talked calm tried to listen to others and gave good reason of their decision would you listen to them? It's exactly what going on if people protest with anger and violence they would not listen to them or not have much attention to them but if we act with calmness and patience they will acknowledge us and try to get to know our beliefs and thoughts.
Explanation: My 3 reasons simplified are if you use anger you will receive anger back, there have been real examples that actually work and changed people in where they did not use anger and it still worked basically it's been proved that even though you do not use anger it still works.My last reason is that you have to think about it, would you listen to people who use anger and violence or would you listen to people who are calm and patient and inspire other people with truth and kindness.
Because back then they believe that if they didn't see it then it is not there or created for example when the french believe that the earth is flat but we know now that it is round.
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Unfortunately, you did not attach the texts or excerpts for reference.
However, trying to help you, we can comment based on our knowledge of the topic.
Konnikova and Nisbet's opinions toward the news media are that often journalists not always are responsible when writing or reporting the news.
Journalist Matthew C. Nisbet wrote the article "Why Partisans View Mainstream Media as Biased and Ideological Media as Objective," in July 2011. In the article, he questions the way some journalists try to bias information by the way they write and use certain terms in order to get the reader to think in a determined way.
On the other hand, journalist Maria Konnikova wrote an article titled "How Headlines Change the Way We Think," in December 2014. In the article, she questions the way some journalists try to influence the reader's mind catching its attention through the use of sensationalism or biased headlines that are not completely true or cause confusion.
