Answer:
Explanation:
Solution-
According to Senator Jones, the elasticity of taxable income is larger, which means that due to a certain percentage rise in taxes, the taxable income rises by a greater percentage. Also, according to Senator Smith, the elasticity of taxable income is small, which means that due to a certain percentage rise in taxes, the taxable income rises by a smaller percentage.
(I) Under Senator Jones assumptions, due to rise in taxes, the taxable income has risen considerably as compared to Senator Smith assumptions. Thus the estimates of additional revenue from the tax increase will be larger under Senator Jones assumptions, compared to Smith's assumptions.
(ii) Since under Senator Jones assumptions, elasticity of taxable income is large. So due to rise in taxes, there is a significant proportional rise in taxable income under Jone's assumptions compared to Senator Smith assumptions. Thus the costs of the tax increase is borne more under Senator Jones assumptions , compared to Smith's assumptions.
Answer: The fair market value of the free tour to Costa Rica is a taxable income.
Professor Vanessa Lazlo won the free tour in a draw, where a prize is awarded by chance.
Publication 525 of the IRS defines taxable and non taxable income.
The IRS lists winnings from raffles and lotteries under Other income.
It also declares that the fair market value of winnings from raffles and lotteries are winnings from gambling. Hence the fair market values of non cash prizes are taxable and must be included as income.
Answer:
heat map
Explanation:
The map that Simone will use will be a Heat map, which is a graph that uses colors for the understanding of the information, that is, according to the color suggested by the map, it is possible to identify patterns that are desired, as in the case of the question above, where each variation sells best and in which regions.
In the heat map, each color corresponds to a value, and this tool is widely used in digital marketing, for understanding customer behaviors on websites, for example.
Answer:
$30,300 and $384,000
Explanation:
The computation of the gain and the amount should acquired is shown below;
The gain is
= Fair value - undepreciable cost
= $492,000 - $461,700
= $30,300
And, the amount at which the computed should be recorded is equivalent to the fair value i..e $384,000
The same is considered and relevant
Answer:
Direct labor efficiency variance= $9,360 unfavorable
It is unfavorable because it took longer to produce 975 units than the standard time estimated.
Explanation:
Giving the following information:
Standard direct labor hour per unit= 7.2 hours
Standard rate= $13
Actual units= 975
Actual hours= 7,800
Actual rate= $12.44
<u>The direct labor time variance is also known as the direct labor efficiency variance. It calculates the effect on costs of the time required to produce the actual amount of units.</u>
We need to use the following formula:
Direct labor time (efficiency) variance= (Standard Quantity - Actual Quantity)*standard rate
Standard quantity= 975 units*7.20= 7,020 hours
Direct labor efficiency variance= (7,020 - 7,800)*12= $9,360 unfavorable
It is unfavorable because it took longer to produce 975 units than the standard time estimated.
