Sum of interior angles of a triangle = 180°
x+40+30= 180°
x+ 70=180
x= 180-70
x= 110°
Here, to find the average rate of change, you would simply divide 270 by 63. And when that is done, you would get a long decimal. 4.285714285714286
And since you obviously can't put in such a long decimal as your answer, you would round it instead. Once rounded, you would end up with 4.29 (because the number after 8 is five, which rounds up, which would turn the 8 to 9.)
$150 = 1 month
Movie ticket=$15
Ballet ticket=$35
Money spent
1 ballet ticket=$35
3 movie tickets=(3x15)=$45
Money spent =$80
Money left=(total amount-money spent)
=($150 -$80)
=$70
Ballet shows Julie would be able to attend=$70/$35
=2
Julie would be able to attend two ballet shows and stay in her budget
Answer:
yes
Step-by-step explanation:
because the corresponding angles are congruent, the triangles are congruent through CPCTC. If two sides are congruent and an included angle, then the triangles are congruent through the SAS postulate. And if two sides and a non-included angle are congruent then the triangles are congruent through the AAS postulate. Any way of looking at this proves congruency through various postulates, therefore the trianlges are congruent.
Answer:
(a) 7 essays and 29 multiple questions
(b) Your friend is incorrect
Step-by-step explanation:
Represent multiple choice with M and essay with E.
So:
--- Number of questions
--- Points
Solving (a): Number of question of each type.
Make E the subject of formula in 

Substitute 36 - M for E in 


Collect Like Terms


Divide both sides by -4


Substitute 29 for M in 


Solving (b): Can the multiple questions worth 4 points each?
It is not possible.
See explanation.
If multiple question worth 4 points each, then
would be:

Where x represents the number of points for essay questions.
Substitute 7 for E and 29 for M.


Subtract 116 from both sides



Make x the subject

Since the essay question can not have worth negative points.
Then, it is impossible to have the multiple questions worth 4 points
<em>Your friend is incorrect.</em>