Answer:
I would believe it to be called Segregation
Answer: It is a complicated situation, would try to alert her of all the rich that it is illegal, all the possibilities of diseases that the child could have. I could not help but support her but it would be necessary to say that in ethical terms she is very wrong. I would advise you to adopt a child because there are so many children who need love, why spend so much and take so many risks when you have thousands of children who just want to be loved?
Answer and Explanation:
1. Prosecutors may claim that the inaccurate report to which Rachel had access could induce misinterpretation on her part and that, in any case, Peter was already on the police for vandalism, which contributed to Rachel's conclusion. These justifications would not be successful, because Rachel had many ways to find out what actually happened to Peter.
2. Peter would sue Rachel for defamation and would likely succeed, as he has several witnesses that Rachel released incorrect information and that it affects his reputation.
3. The current malice is necessary in this case because Peter is a very well-known and popular person, and it is important that the current malice is inserted in the case, to speed up the process.
4. The fair report privilege can be used to protect Rachel, since the false information about Peter that she exposed, had as its only source a public document that induced her to publish the defamation.
My answer for this question would be AGREE. Yes, I don't like to work with ignorant people. Ignorance is a choice. Ignorance can be avoided when you have the eagerness to learn. Ignorance is like an excuse for those people who are lazy enough to learn and people like these are considered a liability.
I believe the answer is: by proposing that the state legislature fund it in the budget
After the program is proposed to the state legislature, the legislature would review the program and determine whether the change is necessary and whether the states have all the necessary fund to actualise the program in that current years. If the proposal passed the review, the fund would be available for the government to spend.
